
by: Bill Dupray posted: 2009-10-25 08:49:00
Viewed 876 times. 2 Comments.
Not to be the master of the obvious here, but it is going to be hard to convince people that the earth is warming . . . when it is not.
The earth's temperature peaked in 1998. It's been falling ever since; it dropped dramatically in 2007 and got worse in 2008, when temperatures touched 1980 levels.
But we'll give ABC credit for reporting the poll numbers. Then they get downright hilarious trying to discredit it eight ways to Sunday. The advocacy is top-notch, it is just too bad that they don't see it as such.
Just 57 percent think there is solid evidence the world is getting warmer, down 20 points in just three years, a new poll says. And the share of people who believe pollution caused by humans is causing temperatures to rise has also taken a dip, even as the U.S. and world forums gear up for possible action against climate change. . . .Only about a third, or 36 percent of the respondents, feel that human activities ? such as pollution from power plants, factories and automobiles ? are behind a temperature increase. That's down from 47 percent from 2006 through last year's poll.
So only a small (and drastically shrinking) minority thinks that we are causing any global warming. The rest of the normal people presumably think one of two things, either (1) the planet is not warming (so the whole issue is moot), or (2) that bright yellow ball in the sky seems to have something to do with the earth's temperature. Either way, this hardly seems the time to go taking over all of American industry with a Cap and Trade scheme and taxing the bejesus out of the American people. Let's just say it ain't exactly a stimulus package.
But ABC dives right in with the standard attacks. First we have the "settled science" of global warming with which we are not allowed to argue.
At the same time, there has been mounting scientific evidence of climate change ? from melting ice caps to the world's oceans hitting the highest monthly recorded temperatures this summer.
Hmmm. I heard a little something different in a couple of places about those 'melting' ice caps.
First, the 2009 summer minimum Arctic Sea Ice Extent [Area of ocean with at least 15 percent sea ice] that was predicted by alarmists to decline, instead, grew dramatically. According to International Arctic Research Center AMSR-E satellite data, it grew by about 1 million square kilometers of ice (1.4 times the size of Texas), which is a 23 percent growth above 2007 and 11.5 percent growth above 2008 sea-ice levels, respectively.More bad news for alarmists came when results of the Arctic Sea Ice Expedition were released. NASA characterized this expedition as a six-nation, 20-scientist Arctic expedition, equipped with an aircraft that had precision measurement instruments. Alarmists had argued that new Arctic sea-ice growth was thinner and less robust than older ice. The expedition instead found new sea ice was much thicker, up to four meters in places, which was more than twice what was expected.
I guess ABC didn't find any of that in the "settled" science. But they nevertheless proceed undaunted.
The poll was released a day after 18 scientific organizations wrote Congress to reaffirm the consensus behind global warming. A federal government report Thursday found that global warming is upsetting the Arctic's thermostat.
Funny, they must have forgotten to mention that 650 of the world's leading climatologists met in Poland in December and declared that man-made global warming is a media-generated myth, without scientific basis. Then there was the 2009 International Conference on Climate Change in New York earlier this year, in which at least 70 scientists seem to have missed the memo about the "settled science." Oh yeah, and the They kept talking saying crazy stuff like "we don't agree" and "the science shows something else." Surely these people must be silenced.
Then ABC goes with the perennial favorite of lefties who are losing an argument: The people are confused by crazy things like weather and, lobbyists, or something.
Andrew Weaver, a professor of climate analysis at the University of Victoria in British Columbia, said politics could be drowning out scientific awareness. [me - now there is some professor-speak for you]"It's a combination of poor communication by scientists, a lousy summer in the Eastern United States, people mixing up weather and climate and a full-court press by public relations firms and lobby groups trying to instill a sense of uncertainty and confusion in the public," he said.
Translation: Dammit! If people weren't so stupid, we'd have this thing in the bag already.
So, to help turn the tide, ABC decides to haul out a little more of that "settled science."
Though there are exceptions, the vast majority of scientists agree that global warming is occurring and that the primary cause is a buildup of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere from the burning of fossil fuels, such as oil and coal.Jane Lubchenco, head the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, told a business group meeting at the White House Thursday: "The science is pretty clear that the climate challenge before us is very real. We're already seeing impacts of climate change in our own backyards."
In whose backyard? Have you noticed any global warming in your backyard? If not, you must be confused. You'd better read up a little more on the "settled science."
Surprisingly, it seems that the more liberal you are, the more the science is settled.
People living in the Midwest and mountainous areas of the West are far less likely to view global warming as a serious problem and to support limits on greenhouse gases than those in the Northeast and on the West Coast. Both the House and Senate bills have been drafted by Democratic lawmakers from Massachusetts and California.
Oh yeah, and even if you are a Warmer, turns out that China and India aren't with you and aren't coming to Copenhagen. So keep in mind that whatever the Democrats do with Cap and Trade or the "world community" does at Copenhagen, we are unilaterally killing our own economy while two of the world's biggest "polluters" charge onward. They must marvel that we are hell-bent on chasing a hoax while they continue to go about the business of living in the real world.
Though ABC gratuitously includes the liberal talking points and mounts an impressive defense on behalf of the Warmers, they grudgingly concede that the American people are figuring out the truth.
Note: The link in the first paragraph is now fixed.
Tags: ABC, MSM, Copenhagen,
Trackback url: http://patriotroom.com/article/abc-all-upset-at-poll-showing-huge-drop-global-warming-believers/trackback
But Dr. Pachauri and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are now under intense scrutiny, facing accusations of scientific sloppiness and potential financial conflicts of interest from climate skeptics, right-leaning politicians and even some mainstream scientists. Senator John Barrasso, a Wyoming Republican, called for Dr. Pachauri?s resignation last week. Critics, writing in Britain?s Sunday Telegraph and elsewhere, have accused Dr. Pachauri of profiting from his work as an adviser to businesses, including Deutsche Bank and Pegasus Capital Advisors, a New York investment firm ? a claim he denies. They have also unearthed and publicized problems with the intergovernmental panel?s landmark 2007 report on climate change, which concluded that the planet was warming and that humans were likely to blame.
Views: 24 Comments: 0
The share of the blame comes as cracks are beginning to show in Emanuel?s once-impregnable political armor... on Capitol Hill he?s under fire for poor execution of the president?s healthcare agenda in the Senate... Senate Democrats grilled White House advisers last week during a special Senate Democratic retreat, expressing frustration over the lack of a clear plan. While Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) ripped chief political strategist David Axelrod, Senate Democrats say Emanuel, who was more closely involved in managing negotiations in Congress, also deserves scrutiny.
Views: 26 Comments: 0
Michelle Obama defended her husband against some of his most vocal critics, saying President Obama did a "phenomenal" job this year and that change is a long-term process. The first lady talks about her nationwide campaign called "Let's Move." "I think my husband has done a phenomenal job staying on course, looking his critics in the eye, coming up with clear solutions against staying the course," Michelle Obama told Robin Roberts in an exclusive morning television interview on "Good Morning America." "That's what leadership is. But people have the right to criticize the President of the United States."Let me finish that last thought for you, Michelle. I see you rubbing your hands together and thinking, "Yes, for now people have the right to criticize him, but we're working on changing that."
Views: 36 Comments: 0
In his letter, being sent out to Arpaio supporters today as part of a 100,000-person national direct mail drop, the sheriff calls Hayworth's decision to challenge McCain "courageous." And he pledges to help Hayworth "every step of the way." "Senator McCain has served this country admirably but it's time to replace his moderate or even liberal positions on taxes, the border, social causes and big bank bailouts with a consistent conservative like J.D.," Arpaio continues. "After years of running over Republican principles his entire career no election year conversion to our way of thinking will save his campaign from voters that want conservatives to be a part of the solution rather than part of the problem," he says.
Views: 50 Comments: 0
McCain now finds himself jammed, moving starkly ? and often awkwardly ? to the right, apparently in an effort to gain favor among the same voters whom Mr. Hayworth, a consistent voice for the far right, could pull toward him like taffy come summer. McCain now sharply criticizes the bailout bill he voted for, pivoted from his earlier position that the Guant?namo Bay detention facility should be closed, offered only a muted response to the Supreme Court?s decision undoing campaign finance laws and backed down from statements that gays in the military would be O.K. by him... ?John is undergoing a campaign conversion,? Mr. Hayworth said. Hayworth?s radio-personality bluster and big emotions.. may now have a part in the greater populist narrative that threatens many of the nation?s more centrist Republicans.
Views: 33 Comments: 0
Iran said Tuesday that it had begun producing higher-grade enriched uranium, marking a new and potentially dangerous turn in Tehran's confrontation with the West over its nuclear ambitions... U.S. National Intelligence Director Dennis C. Blair told the House intelligence committee last week that "Iran has the scientific, the technical, the industrial capacity to produce enough highly enriched uranium for a weapon in the next few years and eventually to produce a nuclear weapon. The central issue is a political decision by Iran to do so."
Views: 33 Comments: 0
I wouldn't want my fingerprints on anything this administration or congress proposes. Reid told reporters the bill would be introduced on Tuesday, and that it would include an extension of the tax breaks... Reid did not say how expensive the jobs bill would be. The Senate had been considering a package of roughly $80 billion. The House passed a larger jobs bill before Christmas, but now plans to unveil a different bill independent of that package, which did not garner Republican support.
Views: 61 Comments: 0
Back in November, the House passed its health care bill by a narrow 220 to 215 margin, with 39 Democrats voting against it. Since then, the one Republican who voted for it ? Joseph Cao ? has indicated that he would not support the bill a second time around given the weaker language on abortion in the Senate version. In addition, Florida Rep. Robert Wexler already retired prematurely. Factor in Murtha?s death today, and Pelosi is down to 217 votes ? one short of passage. To pass the bill at some point in the next few months, she?ll need to flip a Democrat who is already on record voting against the bill.
Views: 124 Comments: 1
Don't think that Republicans can't be sucked in when an anti-Wall Street lynch mob gets its blood up. Recall that Sarbanes-Oxley, the devastating antigrowth response in 2002 to the Enron and Worldcom scandals, was passed with virtually unanimous support by Republicans in Congress, and signed by a Republican president. Recall that last year 85 House Republicans voted for a 90% tax on bonuses for any employee of any bank that took more than $5 billion in TARP money. Investors got some good news last Friday. Stocks resisted following through on Thursday's sharp plunge after (Congress) reached an impasse on bank re-regulation. That's a nice down payment on what investors need a lot more of now: proof that the GOP won't join Democrats in a populist rush to seek revenge against Wall Street.
Views: 79 Comments: 3
Just two years after Mr. Obama helped his party pull in record Wall Street contributions ? $89 million from the securities and investment business, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics ? some of his biggest supporters, like Mr. Dimon, have become the industry?s chief lobbyists against his regulatory agenda. Republicans are rushing to capitalize on what they call Wall Street?s ?buyer?s remorse? with the Democrats. And industry executives and lobbyists are warning Democrats that if Mr. Obama keeps attacking Wall Street ?fat cats,? they may fight back by withholding their cash.
Views: 78 Comments: 2
It is interesting how conservatives are the only ones who are familiar with the unsettled science that proves the earth is in a cooling phase now, & how non-conservative just cannot bring themselves to even acknowledge the mounting evidence of global cooling.
Thanks, Bill. Great post. You're pretty funny sometimes.