x

Please Login




Register Here!

On Politics, We Can Always See the Whites of Their Eyes.

 Search:  
Login / Register   About Us   Advertise   Contact Us  
RSS Feed

The Patriot Room

Attend virtual townhall with Congressman tonight at 9:30 p.m. Eastern

by: Publius   posted: 2009-09-29 13:43:00
Viewed 346 times. 0 Comments.

Rep. John Carter (R-Tx), a member of the GOP House Leadership and a former judge, informed us in a blogger conference call that he will be hosting a virtual townhall tonight at 9:30 p.m. Eastern and will be taking questions from members of the public. CSPAN will broadcast floor speeches covering the status of certain legislation on issues such as ACORN hearings, Obama's Czars, auditing the Federal Reserve, and the Democrat abuses in running the House of Representatives. After that, Rep. Carter will return to his office, fire up the web-cam and take questions from the public by email or Twitter. The web-cast, as he's calling it, can be seen here. Anybody can ask a question, so if you've got one, you can Twitter Congressman Carter at JudgeCarter or send him an email at JudgeCarter@gmail.com.

The MSM refuse to cover Republican alternatives to Democrat proposals, so the GOP is making great efforts to go around them and get the word out through bloggers and directly to the people via virtual-townhalls, web-casts, and other new media avenues. So, whether you are a blogger or just a right-winger on the DHS terrorist list, this is a chance to have a question answered and get the word out to folks on our side of the aisle.

Here is the audio of the conference call, which runs just under 17 minutes.

Bill asked Rep. Carter about President Obama’s unprecedented use of czars and whether Congress has the authority to curtail the power of such Executive branch officials. He stated that he supports Rep. Jack Kingston’s bill, H.R.3569 - The Sunset All Czars Act, to do away with the current czars and require Senate confirmation of any new ones. The text is pretty straightforward.

To provide a sunset date for all presidentially appointed czars, to require Senate confirmation of those positions, and to provide that appropriated funds may not be used to pay for any salaries and expenses associated with those positions.

Rep. Carter also supports Rep. Ron Paul's (R-Tx.), bill (H.R. 1207) to audit the Federal Reserve. We asked, even acknowledging the prudence of auditing an agency that controls so much taxpayer money, whether an audit would nevertheless turn the Fed into just another political football, with members of congress politicizing monetary policy and rewarding cronies. Rep. Carter agreed that politicization is obviously a possibility, but that the bill is designed to provide congress with information via an audit and that the value of having the information outweighs the risk of potential partisan abuses.

Clyde asked:

Q: The malfeasance removed by the take down of ACORN is just the beginning. The SEIU worked side by side with ACORN. Is there any attempt in Congress to look at the broader failures manifested in ACORN from voter-registration fraud to mis-characterization as a non-partisan non-profit entity - and apply the lessons learned to all non-profit through honest and detailed audits?

A: Rep. Carter stated that the politicization of the review process of entities such as ACORN is a tremendous challenge. "All anyone had to do was turn on the television to see ACORN members out actively campaigning for the Obama campaign." "The U.S. Government," he went on, "is weak and poor at oversight. We simply do not watch our money - it's our biggest failure. We are spending more money that at any time in history, and we don't watch it. $55 million went to political operatives because of this failure of oversight, with $8 billion more sitting out there to go to ACORN's web of companies or similar entities."

The Democrats are in charge of the Congress, and therefore oversight. They had to be publicly shamed by the ACORN videotapes, he went on, before they distanced themselves from ACORN. We need better, more active oversight of where our money is spent.

Q: From the outside, it seems that the House Majority Leadership is pushing their agenda with ferocity because they realize that their window in the 111th is narrow. The illusion of a mandate will be factually wiped out once the NJ and VA governor races go Republican, the House primaries show strong races against their present majority, and the fundraising totals reflect the polls. Do you view the 111th as unique, or is this un-American behavior merely a more-reported version of what you saw in the 110th and earlier Congresses?

A: Republicans are not clean. When they were in charge, I also witnessed bills being rammed through, Rep. Carter told us. However, I have never witnessed anything close to what is happening now. We always had debate and amendments on appropriations bills. With this 111th Congress, they have changed the Rules to cut off open debate and amendments. Legislation is introduced at the 11th hour and will very little debate. It's worse than I have ever seen.

Tune in to the web-cast tonight and see what other inside information we can get.

Related Articles


Links to this post

Trackback url: http://patriotroom.com/article/attend-virtual-townhall-with-congressman-tonight-at-7-30-p-m-eastern/trackback

Comments 0

Have an opinion?

 Name (required)
 Email (required)
 Website

If you were a member you wouldn't have to input that stuff!


What is 2 + 3 ? (seriously... for moderates the answer is 4 and for liberals the answer is cat)

Note: Your comment may be held for moderation.

blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you

Publius' Newsstand

  • Conference of Bishops: It is the unanimous view...

    Do we really need to state the obvious? Laws are made and changed in the Legislative Branch, not the Executive. Only in dictatorships are laws made by the Executive Branch.
    According to these rulings, such health legislation creates a statutory requirement for abortion funding, unless Congress clearly forbids such funding. That is why the Hyde amendment was needed in 1976, to stop Medicaid from funding 300,000 abortions a year. The statutory mandate construed by the courts would override any executive order or regulation. This is the unanimous view of our legal advisors and of the experts we have consulted on abortion jurisprudence. Only a change in the law enacted by Congress, not an executive order, can begin to address this very serious problem in the legislation."

      Views: 69 Comments: 0

  • Breaking: Hoyer - We don't have the votes yet

    House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) predicted Sunday that Democrats will have the votes to pass the massive health care bill later in the day, but he suggested a number of crucial Members were still undecided. “There are still Members looking at it and trying to make up their minds, but we think there are going to be 216-plus votes when we call the roll,” Hoyer said on NBC’s "Meet the Press.” He added, "We’re going to pass this bill.” Hoyer said the remaining votes the Democrats need are “in the low single digits, certainly.”

      Views: 86 Comments: 0

  • Senate bill requires 67 vote supermajority to k...

    So the Dems now want to decide who lives and who dies so badly, they have rigged the rules to require 67 votes to kill the death panels. Keep in mind this is the same number of votes needed to pass a Constitutional Amendment.
    [Democrats] have inserted . . . a provision that it would take a supermajority of 67 votes in the Senate for future legislative bodies to even consider amendments to its provisions for "death panels." . . . The bill states, "It shall not be in order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment, or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection." That subsection addresses rules and regulations that doctors would be ordered to follow by the "Independent Medicare Advisory Boards a/k/a the Death Panels," RedState reported.

      Views: 72 Comments: 1

  • Dems trash Tricare, start losing votes: Nye is ...

    Remember, these are the people who bristle when you say they do not support the troops and question their patriotism. Democrat Glen Nye (Va) says he's not that kind of Democrat.
    The original version of legislation in the House had specifically exempted TRICARE from being affected. However, when the final bill language was released on Thursday afternoon, it was revealed that neither the Senate bill nor the reconciliation package contained an exemption for TRICARE. “Our military families need to be able to count on their health care benefits, and I am not willing to risk negative consequences for our military personnel and their families, particularly at a time when our troops are serving overseas in harm’s way,” said Nye.

      Views: 58 Comments: 0

  • Stupak this morning: Until we have a deal on ab...

    The possible deal would focus on an executive order that would specify there would be no public funding for abortions in the healthcare bill. "We're close but we're not there yet," Stupak said. Democratic leaders said Sunday they have the votes on healthcare reform, but Stupak said until there is a deal struck, they don't have the 216 votes they need. Stupak said "there were eight of us" in the negotiating room, all of them no votes.

      Views: 45 Comments: 3

  • Waxman: No 'Deem and Pass' - We pass the Senate...

    Hmmm. If Demon Pass is dead (and it is dead according to multiple sources), then they either have the votes and we are just waiting for it, or they would rather lose on an up or down vote so as to avoid the appearance of being Enemies of the State. Since the meeting broke down into chaos, one wonders if they actually have the votes.
    The problem is the sequence. Can the House vote to amend something that isn't the law, as the Senate bill will not be law before the president's signature? The Rules Committee meeting turned into mass confusion when Democratic Rep. Henry Waxman said, "We're not going to 'deem' the bill passed. We're going to pass the Senate bill…I would be against the idea of 'deeming' something -- we either pass it or we don't."

      Views: 96 Comments: 4

  • Rep. Altmire confirms: NO

    Nancy has about run out of "yes" votes: Congressman Jason Altmire will vote against the latest version of health care reform when the U.S. House of Representatives votes on the bill this weekend. Altmire confirmed that he has decided to vote no in a telephone conversation with KDKA Political Editor Jon Delano. The McCandless Democrat is expected to post a statement on his website later today.

      Views: 112 Comments: 0

  • JIP: Obama Approval Under Disapproval on RCP

    Tough to be Barry: Real Clear Politics, or RCP for short, is a news site that averages approval/disapproval polls together, forming a very non-partisan system. For the last year and change, I have closely watched the approval of the President. Slowly but surely, it kept going lower and lower and lower. The President was at his peak on January 29, 2009 with an approval of 63.5 and a disapproval of only 19.3, a 44.2% difference. From the beginning of March to the end of June, Obama's approval/disapproval held moderately steady. But then it happened. The President began calling for radical reforms to the American Health Care System. While reform is needed, this "change" that the President was peddling did not sit well with the American people.

      Views: 200 Comments: 0

  • Will House recon bill surive intact in Senate? ...

    Very clear. Toast: FTA: Senate Budget Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) said Thursday that it is unlikely the Senate will be able to pass a health care reconciliation bill unchanged from what the House passes. Conrad said the Senate Parliamentarian has declined to make rulings on several issues in the bill that Republicans are likely to challenge under the “Byrd rule.” That rule states that, among other things, every provision of a budget reconciliation bill must have a budget impact and cannot be “extraneous.” “Although we’ve spent many, many hours with the Parliamentarian, some things he has not yet rendered a conclusion” on, Conrad said. “He wants to hear from both sides before he does.” Conrad continued: “Do I expect there will be some additional Byrd rule challenges that will be upheld? Yeah. I do.”

      Views: 105 Comments: 1

  • Another flip from Yes to No: Rep. Michael Arcur...

    Rep. Mike Arcuri (D., N.Y.), a sophomore who had a tough go of it in 2008, will vote nay on Obamacare, both on the House floor and in the Rules Committee. The Rules vote is symbolic, since Democrats outnumber Republicans there two-to-one. But the floor vote could go either way. It is obviously a blow to Pelosi's chances of hitting 216.

      Views: 176 Comments: 0

Get Your PR Button!

Copyright © 2008-2009 Patriot Room Media, LLC
Privacy Policy  Terms Of Service