
by: Scott Martin posted: 2009-07-10 14:48:00
Viewed 436 times. 0 Comments.
In a piece titled, "Finding the Limits of U.S. Power," Alan Cowell of the New York Times notes:
But, diplomatically, the unfinished business lies in North Korea and Iran — twin beacons of nuclear ambition casting a baleful, contrary light onto the frontiers of America’s ability to impose its will on those who see nuclear technology as a portal to respect and influence that would otherwise elude them.And perhaps, in a backhanded way, the real puzzle lies not so much in America’s deployment of power as in the acknowledgment of its limits.
In fact, the real puzzle lies more in discovering just how willing the new administration is to give up its power on issues of national security, while extending its power to control more and more aspects of domestic life. American power can override the actions of the Sun, but can't overcome a senile old man in North Korea? How arrogant to assume the former; how pathetic to fear the latter!
Last Sunday, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. vouchsafed that “the United States cannot dictate to another sovereign power what they can and cannot do.” ...his remarks may have been no more than a casual misstatement, soon disowned by the White House...Visiting Moscow this week, President Barack Obama spoke of those same interlocking themes of power and sovereignty.
“In 2009, a great power does not show strength by dominating or demonizing other countries,” he said. “The days when empires could treat sovereign states as pieces on a chess board are over.”
In Obama's 2009 world, a great power shows strength by talking. Mostly about nothing. When faced with Poland's Soviet-ordered suppression of Solidarity in 1981, Ronald Reagan made clear that the United States can and would dictate what another nation could comfortably do. Barack Obama all but ignored a similar situation in Iran in 2009.
When faced with a lunatic dictator testing America's military mettle in 1986, Reagan used his military to alert Moammar Kadafi to the fact that he breathed only with America's consent. We haven't heard much from the little despot since. Faced with a similar nutjob in Kim Jong Il in 2009, Barack Obama did nothing.
Barack Obama would have you believe that times have changed. To some extent they have, but not to the extent that we can afford the Carterization of foreign policy. Jimmy Carter tried Obama's strategy before Reagan. Reagan eventually took over and fixed most of the problems unrestrained liberalism had caused, and ended the Cold War.
But Reagan did not do the impossible. He did not change human nature, and a foreign policy based on hope and change is not a safe or effective foreign policy. A President who hopes that the love and admiration others feel for him will change their aggressive behavior is a President who is set up to be bullied, and deserves it. And a country that elects such a naive lightweight to high office deserves what it gets, at least in the short term.
Tags: Iran, Reagan, north korea, Military, Foreign Policy, Obama,
Trackback url: http://patriotroom.com/article/finding-the-limit-of-u-s-power--his-name-is-obama/trackback
Views: 46 Comments: 0
Views: 55 Comments: 0
Views: 136 Comments: 0
Views: 102 Comments: 0
Views: 91 Comments: 1
House Republicans approved a conference-wide moratorium on earmarks on Thursday one day after a House committee enacted a ban on for-profit earmarks. The Republican's moratorium is more extensive than the House Appropriations Committee's ban in that it applies to all earmarks for all members of their caucus. "For millions of Americans, the earmark process in Congress has become a symbol of a broken Washington," they said. "We believe the time has come for House Republicans to adopt an immediate, unilateral moratorium on all earmarks."
Views: 59 Comments: 1
Gallup's annual update on Americans' attitudes toward the environment shows a public that over the last two years has become less worried about the threat of global warming, less convinced that its effects are already happening, and more likely to believe that scientists themselves are uncertain about its occurrence. In response to one key question, 48% of Americans now believe that the seriousness of global warming is generally exaggerated, up from 41% in 2009 and 31% in 1997, when Gallup first asked the question.That increase to 48% is fully 7 points higher than last year, which was also a record high.
Views: 85 Comments: 0
Views: 61 Comments: 0
Views: 85 Comments: 2
Views: 66 Comments: 1
Comments 0
Have an opinion?