
by: Publius posted: 2009-09-28 16:38:00
Viewed 661 times. 0 Comments.
Clyde and Bill just got off a blogger conference call with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to discuss the state of the health care debate. The conversation covered the issues of the Administration's heavy-handed attempts to suppress political free speech by barring Humana from telling its insureds the truth about ObamaCare, the status of the legislation in the Senate, and the potential use of reconciliation by the Democrats to ram it through with 51 votes. Senator McConnell dismissed the President's substantive involvement in the debate, dryly noting the president "would sign anything the Congress sent him, provided it had 'Health Care Reform' written at the top of the page.
The call ran just over 16 minutes. Here is the full audio
Here are a few of our questions.
Bill asked a question about the potential fate of the public option.
My question is about the public option. Nancy Pelosi has been adamant that there will be a public option in the House bill. The New York Times reports today that when Harry Reid merges the two Senate Committee bills, the final bill likely will not contain a public option. And yet we learn today that Senators Schumer and Rockefeller will be offering an amendment to add a public option to the Finance Committee bill.With all this apparent disarray on the left in both the House and the Senate, can you tell us what you think the Democrats’ end game on the public option? If it fails, what do you think their fallback position will be?
Sen. McConnell responded that he thought the Democrats were "prepared to throw it overboard." Several times during the call he was at pains to emphasize that even without the public option or benefits for illegals, which some House members explicitly raised again today, the core bill remains 'fundamentally flawed," and would still result in $500 billion in Medicare cuts, and massive tax increases. He quipped that in Congress "we do not do 1000 page bills very well."
Bill:
The president has essentially been uninvolved in the drafting the health care legislation. He offered no plan himself and has chosen to serve as salesman-in-chief for the Congressional Democrats’ proposals. With a poll out today showing opposition to the health care overhaul at an all-time high, it seems that failure is becoming increasingly possible, if not likely. Do you anticipate that the President will show any leadership on his signature domestic policy? If so, when and what might that be?
McConnell responded that Obama is largely speaking to Democrats, that failure is not an option for them and that the president "would sign anything the Congress sent him, provided it had 'Health Care Reform' written at the top of the page.
Clyde asked about the potential use of reconciliation, also known as the Byrd Rule, to get around the fact that the Democrats likely do not have the 60 votes to invoke cloture and move the bill forward.
Sen. McConnell, there's been a lot of telegraphing that perhaps the democratic majority will seek to employ the Byrd Rule, thus limiting debate and allowing for a simple majority to pass the legislation.The Byrd Rule has been used successfully just 17 times since 1980. Further, the spirit and oftentimes letter of the Byrd Rule can arguably be viewed as anathema to legislation of this type.
First, do you have a feel for whether or not invoking the Byrd Rule is likely. Second, what types of opportunities do you see within the text the bill to call Points of Order based upon the Exceptions listed in the Rule. And, lastly, do you envision whomever may be presiding over the Senate during debate adhering to the conclusions of the Senate Parliamentarian concerning Points of Order if those conclusions would serve to eviscerate large portions on the bill?
Sen. McConnell stated that the democrats we're "fully prepared" to use the Byrd Rule. That shows, he continued, the depth of the desperation of the Democrats in getting this legislation passed that will change one-sixth of the economy with only 20 hours of debate. He went on to say that using this legislative loophole, which has bipartisan opposition, is not the way to convince a skeptical public.
Clyde:
With a 60-member caucus, including members who are either not present through illness or are more respectful of the history and sanctity of the Greatest Deliberative Body in the world, do you see a path where a filibuster could be defeated?
McConnell deferred on making predictions, but did state that "they have 60 members in their caucus - they should be able to do anything they want to."
Clyde:
The discussion on illegals and the public option - and many aspects of the bill - seem to be 'red herrings.' For example, do you see that removal of the coverage of illegals will simply be overtaken by immigration reform legislation down the road?
Sen. McConnell stayed on point - removing coverage for illegals and the public option is not enough. "We do not do thousand-page bills well around here." We need instead, he continuted, to implement incremental fixes in the system: lawsuit liability limits for doctors and hospitals, equal tax code treatment of individuals and corporations for deduction of health-care insurance costs, incentivize wellness programs, and introduce interstate competition in insurance markets.
Noel Sheppard of NewBusters and a reporter from CNS News, were among others who were on the call. We will link as soon as their posts are up.
Trackback url: http://patriotroom.com/article/mcconnell-dems-are-prepared-to-throw-public-option-overboard/trackback
Iran said Tuesday that it had begun producing higher-grade enriched uranium, marking a new and potentially dangerous turn in Tehran's confrontation with the West over its nuclear ambitions... U.S. National Intelligence Director Dennis C. Blair told the House intelligence committee last week that "Iran has the scientific, the technical, the industrial capacity to produce enough highly enriched uranium for a weapon in the next few years and eventually to produce a nuclear weapon. The central issue is a political decision by Iran to do so."
Views: 18 Comments: 0
I wouldn't want my fingerprints on anything this administration or congress proposes. Reid told reporters the bill would be introduced on Tuesday, and that it would include an extension of the tax breaks... Reid did not say how expensive the jobs bill would be. The Senate had been considering a package of roughly $80 billion. The House passed a larger jobs bill before Christmas, but now plans to unveil a different bill independent of that package, which did not garner Republican support.
Views: 52 Comments: 0
Back in November, the House passed its health care bill by a narrow 220 to 215 margin, with 39 Democrats voting against it. Since then, the one Republican who voted for it — Joseph Cao — has indicated that he would not support the bill a second time around given the weaker language on abortion in the Senate version. In addition, Florida Rep. Robert Wexler already retired prematurely. Factor in Murtha’s death today, and Pelosi is down to 217 votes — one short of passage. To pass the bill at some point in the next few months, she’ll need to flip a Democrat who is already on record voting against the bill.
Views: 121 Comments: 1
Don't think that Republicans can't be sucked in when an anti-Wall Street lynch mob gets its blood up. Recall that Sarbanes-Oxley, the devastating antigrowth response in 2002 to the Enron and Worldcom scandals, was passed with virtually unanimous support by Republicans in Congress, and signed by a Republican president. Recall that last year 85 House Republicans voted for a 90% tax on bonuses for any employee of any bank that took more than $5 billion in TARP money. Investors got some good news last Friday. Stocks resisted following through on Thursday's sharp plunge after (Congress) reached an impasse on bank re-regulation. That's a nice down payment on what investors need a lot more of now: proof that the GOP won't join Democrats in a populist rush to seek revenge against Wall Street.
Views: 78 Comments: 3
Just two years after Mr. Obama helped his party pull in record Wall Street contributions — $89 million from the securities and investment business, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics — some of his biggest supporters, like Mr. Dimon, have become the industry’s chief lobbyists against his regulatory agenda. Republicans are rushing to capitalize on what they call Wall Street’s “buyer’s remorse” with the Democrats. And industry executives and lobbyists are warning Democrats that if Mr. Obama keeps attacking Wall Street “fat cats,” they may fight back by withholding their cash.
Views: 78 Comments: 2
The Dow, down almost 104 points, had its 10th triple-digit move in 16 trading days. Shares of big banks pulled the market lower, extending a slump that has led to four straight weekly losses.I can't, for the life of me, understand why bank stocks would be dropping. Inexplicable.
Views: 57 Comments: 2
Contrary to President Obama's promises, voters say special interests have more influence on the political process now than they did a year ago, according to a new poll. The poll, paid for by groups looking to curb the Supreme Court's recent campaign finance ruling, found that majorities of both Republicans and Democrats say special interests have increased their influence since the president took office, and they say Mr. Obama has not done enough to fight back.
Views: 59 Comments: 1
If the starting point for this meeting is the job-killing bills the American people have already soundly rejected, Republicans would rightly be reluctant to participate,” the pair explained in a letter to White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. They also said President Barack Obama should remove reconciliation from the table. Using budget reconciliation rules to move healthcare reform in the Senate would mean Democrats would only need 51 votes on procedural measures instead of 60... On Sunday afternoon however, Obama refused to say he would start from scratch.
Views: 65 Comments: 2
An announcement from his office said Murtha died at 1:18 p.m. at the Virginia Hospital Center, where he had been admitted last week after having his gallbladder removed at Bethesda Naval Hospital.
Views: 166 Comments: 6
The scientist at the centre of the “climategate” email scandal has revealed that he was so traumatised by the global backlash against him that he contemplated suicide. Jones, 57, said he was unprepared for the scandal: “I am just a scientist. I have no training in PR or dealing with crises.”Actually, he's using the term "scientist" loosely there, given that real scientists don't do what he did. And while he may not have any training dealing with crises, he sure was good at generating one: it was called the global warming crisis.
Views: 146 Comments: 3
Comments 0
Have an opinion?