
by: Clyde Middleton posted: 2009-01-22 17:57:00
Viewed 634 times. 0 Comments.
Obama has asked former Sen. George Mitchell (D-ME) to be an envoy to the Middle East situation.
Will he accept? "A lot of it depends on to whom he is going to report. Is he going to report directly to the president or is he going to report through the secretary (of state) to the president," the source added.
Too funny. Seems the answer may be “no” if he is to report to Hillary (PBUH). Take the Arab-Israeli conflict out of the international diplomacy mix, and it seems that Hillary (PBUH) may be back having tea and crumpets outside Belfast.
Speaking of Belfast, that was three gigs ago for Mitchell. He worked out the dry-heave stage of The Troubles, getting Ireland to accept continued occupation of a portion of their country by Betty Windsor & The Englishmen.
After that stint, he did a fact-finding report for Clinton on the Palestinian occupation of historically Israeli lands (more in a bit), and, finally, he headed the steroids investigation for MLB.
The report on his previous Middle East stint is here. In a delicate bit of understatement, Mitchell characterized the two sides:
Despite their long history and close proximity, some Israelis and Palestinians seem not to fully appreciate each other's problems and concerns. Some Israelis appear not to comprehend the humiliation and frustration that Palestinians must endure every day as a result of living with the continuing effects of occupation, sustained by the presence of Israeli military forces and settlements in their midst, or the determination of the Palestinians to achieve independence and genuine self-determination. Some Palestinians appear not to comprehend the extent to which terrorism creates fear among the Israeli people and undermines their belief in the possibility of co-existence, or the determination of the GOI to do whatever is necessary to protect its people. Fear, hate, anger, and frustration have risen on both sides.
Of course, a few things are presumed. Since a person cannot burgle their own home, it seems odd to state that Israel is subjecting anyone to an “occupation” of Israeli lands. Second, it has been clear for decades that the Palestinians have no interest in self-determination. They wish – or perhaps more accurately, the leaders they democratically elect wish – to continue the sordid state of affairs in hopes of out-lasting the Israelis. All one needs to do is recall the 1951 nighttime rooftop meeting between David Ben-Gurion and JFK as they looked out on Jerusalem: The Jewish side was illuminated with commercial and residential life; the Muslim side was dark. The situation has not changed much in the ensuing 58 years.
Mitchell’s report summarized the path to coexistence quickly:
What is important is that the PA make an all-out effort to enforce a complete cessation of violence and that it be clearly seen by the GOI as doing so. The GOI must likewise exercise a 100 percent effort to ensure that potential friction points, where Palestinians come into contact with armed Israelis, do not become stages for renewed hostilities.…
A cessation of Palestinian-Israeli violence will be particularly hard to sustain unless the GOI freezes all settlement construction activity.
To this day, the PA has not done this. The Government of Israel has.
Another point of contention is to bring in outsiders. The Mitchell report stated this:
One of the most controversial subjects raised during our inquiry was the issue of deploying an international force to the Palestinian areas. The PA is strongly in favor of having such a force to protect Palestinian civilians and their property from the IDF and from settlers. The GOI is just as adamantly opposed to an "international protection force," believing that it would prove unresponsive to Israeli security concerns and interfere with bilateral negotiations to settle the conflict.
Now, Hamas wants Turkey to come in. Israel will not agree to such a request. Russia will be knocking soon enough.
In a rather long assault on Mitchell’s report, a Palestinian states the following:
The writing is full of assertions that the report is pro-Israel and anti-Palestinian. The situation has changed significantly since 2001 when the report was issued. First, consider the Jonathan Pollard issue. Clinton promised and reneged to commute his sentence. President Bush just left office without commuting the sentence. Israel will demand his release. Hamas is a much larger player, and Iran is a much more open player. Syria will play the role of The Two-faced Diplomat – Mitchell by day, Iran by night. The PA cannot control Hamas, and Hamas will not accept any change of course unless they have a seat at the table. Israel will not sit with Hamas as it did the PLO. Where does Gilad Shalit fit into the mix? What will Mitchell do the second time? Similar mantra: Cessation of hostilities; control of activities on the respective lands. Those are obvious, and not easily achieved. Creating a Palestinian state is complicated by Israel’s appropriate refusal to give safe passage between Gaza and the West Bank across Israeli lands. How will access to scared tombs and other places be resolved into a sovereign nation? Mitchell has his hands full, and neither country will trust him. Tags: Israel, Hamas, Gaza Strip, Trackback url: http://patriotroom.com/article/mitchell-s-pick-can-t-sit-well-with-either-side/trackbackAs a confidence-building measure, the Mitchell report demands that "the PA...make a 100 percent effort to prevent terrorist operations and to punish perpetrators...[and undertake] immediate steps to apprehend and incarcerate terrorists operating within the PA's jurisdiction." Such a vague formulation can only be interpreted as a call for mass repression of popular and/or organized resistance to continued Israeli occupation. The report effectively holds the PA accountable for any act committed by a Palestinian individual or political organization, including attacks within Israeli territory by Hamas or other opposition elements. Mitchell's assessment pointedly declines to call for an investigation of Israeli conduct in the Occupied Territories, despite severe condemnations by international human rights groups of that conduct. Hence the report rejects the notion that Israel can or should be held responsible for gross violations of the human rights of civilian Palestinian non-combatants (including the killing of at least 120 Palestinian children), or held to standards even remotely similar to those applied to the PA. The deployment of an "international protection force" is made conditional on Israeli approval.
Related Articles
Links to this post
The share of the blame comes as cracks are beginning to show in Emanuel’s once-impregnable political armor... on Capitol Hill he’s under fire for poor execution of the president’s healthcare agenda in the Senate... Senate Democrats grilled White House advisers last week during a special Senate Democratic retreat, expressing frustration over the lack of a clear plan. While Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) ripped chief political strategist David Axelrod, Senate Democrats say Emanuel, who was more closely involved in managing negotiations in Congress, also deserves scrutiny.
Views: 1 Comments: 0
Michelle Obama defended her husband against some of his most vocal critics, saying President Obama did a "phenomenal" job this year and that change is a long-term process. The first lady talks about her nationwide campaign called "Let's Move." "I think my husband has done a phenomenal job staying on course, looking his critics in the eye, coming up with clear solutions against staying the course," Michelle Obama told Robin Roberts in an exclusive morning television interview on "Good Morning America." "That's what leadership is. But people have the right to criticize the President of the United States."Let me finish that last thought for you, Michelle. I see you rubbing your hands together and thinking, "Yes, for now people have the right to criticize him, but we're working on changing that."
Views: 33 Comments: 0
In his letter, being sent out to Arpaio supporters today as part of a 100,000-person national direct mail drop, the sheriff calls Hayworth's decision to challenge McCain "courageous." And he pledges to help Hayworth "every step of the way." "Senator McCain has served this country admirably but it's time to replace his moderate or even liberal positions on taxes, the border, social causes and big bank bailouts with a consistent conservative like J.D.," Arpaio continues. "After years of running over Republican principles his entire career no election year conversion to our way of thinking will save his campaign from voters that want conservatives to be a part of the solution rather than part of the problem," he says.
Views: 46 Comments: 0
McCain now finds himself jammed, moving starkly — and often awkwardly — to the right, apparently in an effort to gain favor among the same voters whom Mr. Hayworth, a consistent voice for the far right, could pull toward him like taffy come summer. McCain now sharply criticizes the bailout bill he voted for, pivoted from his earlier position that the Guantánamo Bay detention facility should be closed, offered only a muted response to the Supreme Court’s decision undoing campaign finance laws and backed down from statements that gays in the military would be O.K. by him... “John is undergoing a campaign conversion,” Mr. Hayworth said. Hayworth’s radio-personality bluster and big emotions.. may now have a part in the greater populist narrative that threatens many of the nation’s more centrist Republicans.
Views: 31 Comments: 0
Iran said Tuesday that it had begun producing higher-grade enriched uranium, marking a new and potentially dangerous turn in Tehran's confrontation with the West over its nuclear ambitions... U.S. National Intelligence Director Dennis C. Blair told the House intelligence committee last week that "Iran has the scientific, the technical, the industrial capacity to produce enough highly enriched uranium for a weapon in the next few years and eventually to produce a nuclear weapon. The central issue is a political decision by Iran to do so."
Views: 31 Comments: 0
I wouldn't want my fingerprints on anything this administration or congress proposes. Reid told reporters the bill would be introduced on Tuesday, and that it would include an extension of the tax breaks... Reid did not say how expensive the jobs bill would be. The Senate had been considering a package of roughly $80 billion. The House passed a larger jobs bill before Christmas, but now plans to unveil a different bill independent of that package, which did not garner Republican support.
Views: 58 Comments: 0
Back in November, the House passed its health care bill by a narrow 220 to 215 margin, with 39 Democrats voting against it. Since then, the one Republican who voted for it — Joseph Cao — has indicated that he would not support the bill a second time around given the weaker language on abortion in the Senate version. In addition, Florida Rep. Robert Wexler already retired prematurely. Factor in Murtha’s death today, and Pelosi is down to 217 votes — one short of passage. To pass the bill at some point in the next few months, she’ll need to flip a Democrat who is already on record voting against the bill.
Views: 124 Comments: 1
Don't think that Republicans can't be sucked in when an anti-Wall Street lynch mob gets its blood up. Recall that Sarbanes-Oxley, the devastating antigrowth response in 2002 to the Enron and Worldcom scandals, was passed with virtually unanimous support by Republicans in Congress, and signed by a Republican president. Recall that last year 85 House Republicans voted for a 90% tax on bonuses for any employee of any bank that took more than $5 billion in TARP money. Investors got some good news last Friday. Stocks resisted following through on Thursday's sharp plunge after (Congress) reached an impasse on bank re-regulation. That's a nice down payment on what investors need a lot more of now: proof that the GOP won't join Democrats in a populist rush to seek revenge against Wall Street.
Views: 78 Comments: 3
Just two years after Mr. Obama helped his party pull in record Wall Street contributions — $89 million from the securities and investment business, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics — some of his biggest supporters, like Mr. Dimon, have become the industry’s chief lobbyists against his regulatory agenda. Republicans are rushing to capitalize on what they call Wall Street’s “buyer’s remorse” with the Democrats. And industry executives and lobbyists are warning Democrats that if Mr. Obama keeps attacking Wall Street “fat cats,” they may fight back by withholding their cash.
Views: 78 Comments: 2
The Dow, down almost 104 points, had its 10th triple-digit move in 16 trading days. Shares of big banks pulled the market lower, extending a slump that has led to four straight weekly losses.I can't, for the life of me, understand why bank stocks would be dropping. Inexplicable.
Views: 57 Comments: 2
Comments 0
Have an opinion?