
by: Bill Dupray posted: 2009-03-07 08:05:00
Viewed 724 times. 7 Comments.
The Left's top three most hated Republicans are Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich, and Sarah Palin. They hate them because all three are unapologetic Conservatives and because the Lefties have a visceral understanding that any one of them has the ability to derail the Left's agenda. Ask yourself why the Libs don't lose their minds over Sen. Tom Coburn, who is every bit as Conservative as the others. It is because the left doesn't fear Coburn can do any damage. We fear most that which can destroy us.
You can also set your watch by the fact that when you write a post about Limbaugh, Gingrich, or Palin, the moonbats will come out of the woodwork with every kind of personal insult about them, while never debating a single issue - the vanguard of the Liberal intelligentsia.
Newt Gingrich was in Ashland, Virginia yesterday and hinted that he may take on Barack Obama in 2012.
From Fox News.
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Thursday he'd seriously consider running for president in 2012.With the mantle of the Republican Party still unclaimed, Gingrich told reporters in Ashland, Va., before a speech to Randolph-Macon College that he and his family would examine the political environment in early 2011, and "look seriously at whether or not we think it's necessary to do it."
"And if we think it's necessary we'll probably do it. And if it isn't necessary we probably won't do it," he said, according to the Richmond Times-Dispatch.
There was a bit more from the Richmond Times-Dispatch.
It's just that right now there aren't many areas where Gingrich sees things going in the right direction. Here's Gingrich on the economy:"I know of no experience in the last 50 years where a big-government spending program has successfully restarted the economy." He also lumped the bailouts proffered by the Bush administration into the mix. "You can't spend your way out of debt."
Gingrich said Obama made a mistake in "ramming" through the $787 billion stimulus package, but having gotten his way, must take ownership if it fails. But Republicans can't just sit back and throw stones.
"I think they have to be the party of better solutions, not the party of opposition," Gingrich said.
And the upcoming governor's race in Virginia will send an early signal to the rest of the nation as to whether Republicans have the right answers.
"The president is setting out a path of very high taxes, very big bureaucracy, moving power to Washington, redistributing wealth, punishing people who are successful, rewarding people who are not successful," Gingrich said.
"I think Virginia will be one of the first tests of that philosophical difference."
Whether or not he seeks his own votes, Gingrich made it clear he plans to be involved in thinking it through, developing and teaching his brand of practical conservatism to the next generation.
"I think it's conceivable that by 2012 you could have a second Contract for America," he said.
Hmmm. A second Contract for America. The first one turned out to be a Contract on the Democrat Party, dislodging them from a 40-year control of Congress, and ushering in 12 years of Republican rule.
They are right to fear Newt.
Tags: Obama, Congress, Newt Gingrich,
Trackback url: http://patriotroom.com/article/newt-gingrich-seriously-considering-2012-run/trackback
That's certainly welcome news. I'd support a Gingrich / Palin ticket.
But I'm Outlaw! like that.
My favourite Republican is Ron Paul.
My curiosity is why the other big Republicans don't realize that Ron Paul's actions have and continue to remain closest to what the REpublican Party 'says' it stands for; small goverment, et al.
Frankly, in my view, many Republicans, just like many Democrats; prime motivations, the issue that 'makes them tick' ain't their particular 'Democrat' or 'Republican' ideologies, which they betray every other day... what makes them tick is their HATE for the other party's members.
And, sadly, many of their followers, have gotten caught in the same trap. And their leaders, know that, and boy do they use it -- ON BOTH SIDES. And the people who have the most emotional, psychological and capital invested in this HATE BLAME GAME, are not so much the politicians, but the MEDIA BIG SHOT COURTIERS! They manipulate their followers, based upon the hate they cultivate in their followers for the opposition side; it has got sweet fuck all to do with the constitution, or any commitment to any ideology.
STand back a bit, and take a big picture look. Ron Paul is one of the very few individuals in Congress, who practices what he preaches, not for a few days or weeks, but has done so for years and years now; sometimes and often as the lone Jonathan Livingston Seagull; but he has stuck to his guns...
Anyway, that's my brief two cents on the issue. The day Gingricht and Rush move over and admit they been shitting on thier Star Ron Paul, and Palin mixes in her views... is the day, Republicans move back to issues, and stop playing this stupid fucking game, and take the country by storm. Just depends whether the Republican 'big shots' like their own fame and status more, than they like to admit they were suckered by the HATE GAME, and drifted very, very far away from the principles of financial and values conservatism.
Lara
The biggest problem with Ron Paul is he is the complete opposite of Obama, and I don't mean in politics. The first time I heard Ron Paul speak I knew he could never be president, he just sounds like a moron. Reminded me a bit of Ross Perot.
He might stand by his principles and that is a rare thing in congress, but presidential he is not.
I think Newt would have a very serious chance of winning. Not only does is present himself very well and adheres to conservative values, but having been Speaker before he also knows how the machine works. Giving his previous success in the 90's he also has good leadership abilities.
The question would be who would be his running mate. I don't think Palin would do it. Let's face it, she was brought in by McCain to energize the base and while she did, Newt doesn't necessarily need that. She would probably better serve herself by going for a senate run then maybe a future presidential run.
What's with the notion that Limbaugh, Gingrich and Palin are "hated." For one thing it's a matter of projecting your own feelings about those with whom you disagree: do you "hate" Obama, Kennedy or Reid? Or do you just disagree with just about everything they advocate?
For another, I don't know any fellow card-carrying liberals who profess a hatred for any of those three, least of all Palin, who most view as a figure of ridicule.
Even if Democrats felt inclined to attack your Holy Trinity, there would be no need: the poor, dispirited GOP is busy shredding itself. Witness the latest debacles with Michael Steele, Bobby Jindal, and the brand-new flare-up between Gingrich and Limbaugh. It's a pleasure just to sit back an witness the self-immolation!
(One last point: why is it that principled, consistent conservatives who are unburdened by the personal baggage of the likes of Limbaugh, Gingrich and Palin DON'T make it to the top of the GOP? What IS wrong with Tom Coburn or Sam Brownback?)
But Dr. Pachauri and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are now under intense scrutiny, facing accusations of scientific sloppiness and potential financial conflicts of interest from climate skeptics, right-leaning politicians and even some mainstream scientists. Senator John Barrasso, a Wyoming Republican, called for Dr. Pachauri’s resignation last week. Critics, writing in Britain’s Sunday Telegraph and elsewhere, have accused Dr. Pachauri of profiting from his work as an adviser to businesses, including Deutsche Bank and Pegasus Capital Advisors, a New York investment firm — a claim he denies. They have also unearthed and publicized problems with the intergovernmental panel’s landmark 2007 report on climate change, which concluded that the planet was warming and that humans were likely to blame.
Views: 29 Comments: 0
The share of the blame comes as cracks are beginning to show in Emanuel’s once-impregnable political armor... on Capitol Hill he’s under fire for poor execution of the president’s healthcare agenda in the Senate... Senate Democrats grilled White House advisers last week during a special Senate Democratic retreat, expressing frustration over the lack of a clear plan. While Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) ripped chief political strategist David Axelrod, Senate Democrats say Emanuel, who was more closely involved in managing negotiations in Congress, also deserves scrutiny.
Views: 27 Comments: 0
Michelle Obama defended her husband against some of his most vocal critics, saying President Obama did a "phenomenal" job this year and that change is a long-term process. The first lady talks about her nationwide campaign called "Let's Move." "I think my husband has done a phenomenal job staying on course, looking his critics in the eye, coming up with clear solutions against staying the course," Michelle Obama told Robin Roberts in an exclusive morning television interview on "Good Morning America." "That's what leadership is. But people have the right to criticize the President of the United States."Let me finish that last thought for you, Michelle. I see you rubbing your hands together and thinking, "Yes, for now people have the right to criticize him, but we're working on changing that."
Views: 37 Comments: 0
In his letter, being sent out to Arpaio supporters today as part of a 100,000-person national direct mail drop, the sheriff calls Hayworth's decision to challenge McCain "courageous." And he pledges to help Hayworth "every step of the way." "Senator McCain has served this country admirably but it's time to replace his moderate or even liberal positions on taxes, the border, social causes and big bank bailouts with a consistent conservative like J.D.," Arpaio continues. "After years of running over Republican principles his entire career no election year conversion to our way of thinking will save his campaign from voters that want conservatives to be a part of the solution rather than part of the problem," he says.
Views: 52 Comments: 0
McCain now finds himself jammed, moving starkly — and often awkwardly — to the right, apparently in an effort to gain favor among the same voters whom Mr. Hayworth, a consistent voice for the far right, could pull toward him like taffy come summer. McCain now sharply criticizes the bailout bill he voted for, pivoted from his earlier position that the Guantánamo Bay detention facility should be closed, offered only a muted response to the Supreme Court’s decision undoing campaign finance laws and backed down from statements that gays in the military would be O.K. by him... “John is undergoing a campaign conversion,” Mr. Hayworth said. Hayworth’s radio-personality bluster and big emotions.. may now have a part in the greater populist narrative that threatens many of the nation’s more centrist Republicans.
Views: 33 Comments: 0
Iran said Tuesday that it had begun producing higher-grade enriched uranium, marking a new and potentially dangerous turn in Tehran's confrontation with the West over its nuclear ambitions... U.S. National Intelligence Director Dennis C. Blair told the House intelligence committee last week that "Iran has the scientific, the technical, the industrial capacity to produce enough highly enriched uranium for a weapon in the next few years and eventually to produce a nuclear weapon. The central issue is a political decision by Iran to do so."
Views: 33 Comments: 0
I wouldn't want my fingerprints on anything this administration or congress proposes. Reid told reporters the bill would be introduced on Tuesday, and that it would include an extension of the tax breaks... Reid did not say how expensive the jobs bill would be. The Senate had been considering a package of roughly $80 billion. The House passed a larger jobs bill before Christmas, but now plans to unveil a different bill independent of that package, which did not garner Republican support.
Views: 61 Comments: 0
Back in November, the House passed its health care bill by a narrow 220 to 215 margin, with 39 Democrats voting against it. Since then, the one Republican who voted for it — Joseph Cao — has indicated that he would not support the bill a second time around given the weaker language on abortion in the Senate version. In addition, Florida Rep. Robert Wexler already retired prematurely. Factor in Murtha’s death today, and Pelosi is down to 217 votes — one short of passage. To pass the bill at some point in the next few months, she’ll need to flip a Democrat who is already on record voting against the bill.
Views: 124 Comments: 1
Don't think that Republicans can't be sucked in when an anti-Wall Street lynch mob gets its blood up. Recall that Sarbanes-Oxley, the devastating antigrowth response in 2002 to the Enron and Worldcom scandals, was passed with virtually unanimous support by Republicans in Congress, and signed by a Republican president. Recall that last year 85 House Republicans voted for a 90% tax on bonuses for any employee of any bank that took more than $5 billion in TARP money. Investors got some good news last Friday. Stocks resisted following through on Thursday's sharp plunge after (Congress) reached an impasse on bank re-regulation. That's a nice down payment on what investors need a lot more of now: proof that the GOP won't join Democrats in a populist rush to seek revenge against Wall Street.
Views: 79 Comments: 3
Just two years after Mr. Obama helped his party pull in record Wall Street contributions — $89 million from the securities and investment business, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics — some of his biggest supporters, like Mr. Dimon, have become the industry’s chief lobbyists against his regulatory agenda. Republicans are rushing to capitalize on what they call Wall Street’s “buyer’s remorse” with the Democrats. And industry executives and lobbyists are warning Democrats that if Mr. Obama keeps attacking Wall Street “fat cats,” they may fight back by withholding their cash.
Views: 79 Comments: 2
I heard Newt on Hannity's afternoon radio show yesterday.
He said that he's not "seriously" considering it.
What he did say was that if there appears to be no credible candidates -- my translation of what he said -- from the Republican Party that he and his family would all confer to consider whether or not he should run