
by: Robert McIntosh posted: 2009-04-05 00:26:00
Viewed 1343 times. 4 Comments.
We all kind of knew this was going to happen. A prominent bank wants to give TARP money back and the administration is refusing the payments. Going so far as to threaten the bank if they proceed.
From the WSJ:
Here's a true story first reported by my Fox News colleague Andrew Napolitano (with the names and some details obscured to prevent retaliation). Under the Bush team a prominent and profitable bank, under threat of a damaging public audit, was forced to accept less than $1 billion of TARP money. The government insisted on buying a new class of preferred stock which gave it a tiny, minority position. The money flowed to the bank. Arguably, back then, the Bush administration was acting for purely economic reasons. It wanted to recapitalize the banks to halt a financial panic.Fast forward to today, and that same bank is begging to give the money back. The chairman offers to write a check, now, with interest. He's been sitting on the cash for months and has felt the dead hand of government threatening to run his business and dictate pay scales. He sees the writing on the wall and he wants out. But the Obama team says no, since unlike the smaller banks that gave their TARP money back, this bank is far more prominent. The bank has also been threatened with "adverse" consequences if its chairman persists. That's politics talking, not economics.
Now why on Earth would the administration refuse to get the money back? Yes, that was a rhetorical question...
The answer of course is control and power. It can be the only explanation. By forcing the banks to keep the money the government can mandate and control the banks.
Trackback url: http://patriotroom.com/article/obama-refuses-tarp-payments/trackback
What the bank ought to do is cash the check and then give it to charity. Let's see the Obama administration spin that.
Perhaps they could lend it out. Perhaps they could disclose their loan rations.
But, if they really would rather hold on to their bonuses than do the right thing, so be it.
Losers.
Views: 86 Comments: 0
Views: 76 Comments: 0
House Republicans approved a conference-wide moratorium on earmarks on Thursday one day after a House committee enacted a ban on for-profit earmarks. The Republican's moratorium is more extensive than the House Appropriations Committee's ban in that it applies to all earmarks for all members of their caucus. "For millions of Americans, the earmark process in Congress has become a symbol of a broken Washington," they said. "We believe the time has come for House Republicans to adopt an immediate, unilateral moratorium on all earmarks."
Views: 52 Comments: 1
Gallup's annual update on Americans' attitudes toward the environment shows a public that over the last two years has become less worried about the threat of global warming, less convinced that its effects are already happening, and more likely to believe that scientists themselves are uncertain about its occurrence. In response to one key question, 48% of Americans now believe that the seriousness of global warming is generally exaggerated, up from 41% in 2009 and 31% in 1997, when Gallup first asked the question.That increase to 48% is fully 7 points higher than last year, which was also a record high.
Views: 80 Comments: 0
Views: 59 Comments: 0
Views: 82 Comments: 2
Views: 63 Comments: 1
Views: 53 Comments: 0
Views: 50 Comments: 0
Views: 36 Comments: 0
The bank should not pursue giving the money back to the government but instead, hire lawyers to get out from under the TARP requirements.