
by: Scott Martin posted: 2009-01-29 17:00:00
Viewed 681 times. 2 Comments.
President Obama signed his first bill into law on Thursday, approving "equal-pay" legislation that he said would “send a clear message that making our economy work means making sure it works for everybody.” In reality, this bill limits the freedom of both employee and employer, and reduces people to representatives of their gender, not the sum of their abilities and aptitudes.
Mr. Obama was surrounded by a group of beaming lawmakers... as he affixed his signature to the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, a law named for an Alabama woman who at the end of a 19-year career as a supervisor in a tire factory complained that she had been paid less than men.After a Supreme Court ruling against her, Congress approved the legislation that expands workers’ rights to sue in this kind of case, relaxing the statute of limitations.
“It is fitting that with.. the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act we are upholding one of this nation’s first principles: that we are all created equal and each deserve a chance to pursue our own version of happiness,” the president said.
Of course, Obama is aware that nobody is hired at gunpoint in America, and that the wage paid an employee is an agreement between two parties to exchange certain work for certain pay. Is Obama arguing that everyone should be paid the same in America? It would seem he is, if words are to have any meaning. You know, "just words" and all that. So in effect, President Obama is supporting equal pay for unequal work...
He said was signing the bill not only in honor of Ms. Ledbetter — who stood behind him, shaking her head and clasping her hands in seeming disbelief — but in honor of his own grandmother, “who worked in a bank all her life, and even after she hit that glass ceiling, kept getting up again” and for his daughters, “because I want them to grow up in a nation that values their contributions, where there are no limits to their dreams.”
It's amazing how casually Obama throws out these notions about how eeevil America is. That nation Obama wants his daughters to grow up in already exists. There wasn't a man in America making more money than my wife in the same position of the same field that she just left. It has nothing to do with her gender, but with her ability to do her job and her persistence in effectively negotiating her own pay.
Ms. Ledbetter will not see any money as a result of the legislation Mr. Obama signed into law. But what she has gotten, aside from celebrity, is personal satisfaction, as she said in the State Dining Room after the signing ceremony.“Goodyear will never have to pay me what it cheated me out of,” she said. “In fact, I will never see a cent. But with the president’s signature today I have an even richer reward.”
Ms. Ledbetter is another one of those false victims the media enjoy showcasing. You weren't cheated, Ms. Ledbetter. You agreed to work for a wage. Goodyear paid you that wage. Grow up.
Trackback url: http://patriotroom.com/article/obama-s-first-bill-limits-freedom-in-wage-negotiations/trackback
Robert is right. This law does little for pay equity and does more to line the pockets of the trial lawyers. As a preliminary matter, it should be noted that statutes of limitations serve an important purpose in our legal system. They limit the number of lawsuits that can be pursued by placing a preference on those that can be litigated most efficiently. In a judicial system already overburdened by overzealous trial lawyers (a separate discussion for another day), placing reasonable limitations is absolutely necessary.
Back in November, the House passed its health care bill by a narrow 220 to 215 margin, with 39 Democrats voting against it. Since then, the one Republican who voted for it — Joseph Cao — has indicated that he would not support the bill a second time around given the weaker language on abortion in the Senate version. In addition, Florida Rep. Robert Wexler already retired prematurely. Factor in Murtha’s death today, and Pelosi is down to 217 votes — one short of passage. To pass the bill at some point in the next few months, she’ll need to flip a Democrat who is already on record voting against the bill.
Views: 115 Comments: 0
Don't think that Republicans can't be sucked in when an anti-Wall Street lynch mob gets its blood up. Recall that Sarbanes-Oxley, the devastating antigrowth response in 2002 to the Enron and Worldcom scandals, was passed with virtually unanimous support by Republicans in Congress, and signed by a Republican president. Recall that last year 85 House Republicans voted for a 90% tax on bonuses for any employee of any bank that took more than $5 billion in TARP money. Investors got some good news last Friday. Stocks resisted following through on Thursday's sharp plunge after (Congress) reached an impasse on bank re-regulation. That's a nice down payment on what investors need a lot more of now: proof that the GOP won't join Democrats in a populist rush to seek revenge against Wall Street.
Views: 77 Comments: 3
Just two years after Mr. Obama helped his party pull in record Wall Street contributions — $89 million from the securities and investment business, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics — some of his biggest supporters, like Mr. Dimon, have become the industry’s chief lobbyists against his regulatory agenda. Republicans are rushing to capitalize on what they call Wall Street’s “buyer’s remorse” with the Democrats. And industry executives and lobbyists are warning Democrats that if Mr. Obama keeps attacking Wall Street “fat cats,” they may fight back by withholding their cash.
Views: 78 Comments: 2
The Dow, down almost 104 points, had its 10th triple-digit move in 16 trading days. Shares of big banks pulled the market lower, extending a slump that has led to four straight weekly losses.I can't, for the life of me, understand why bank stocks would be dropping. Inexplicable.
Views: 57 Comments: 2
Contrary to President Obama's promises, voters say special interests have more influence on the political process now than they did a year ago, according to a new poll. The poll, paid for by groups looking to curb the Supreme Court's recent campaign finance ruling, found that majorities of both Republicans and Democrats say special interests have increased their influence since the president took office, and they say Mr. Obama has not done enough to fight back.
Views: 58 Comments: 1
If the starting point for this meeting is the job-killing bills the American people have already soundly rejected, Republicans would rightly be reluctant to participate,” the pair explained in a letter to White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. They also said President Barack Obama should remove reconciliation from the table. Using budget reconciliation rules to move healthcare reform in the Senate would mean Democrats would only need 51 votes on procedural measures instead of 60... On Sunday afternoon however, Obama refused to say he would start from scratch.
Views: 64 Comments: 2
An announcement from his office said Murtha died at 1:18 p.m. at the Virginia Hospital Center, where he had been admitted last week after having his gallbladder removed at Bethesda Naval Hospital.
Views: 164 Comments: 5
The scientist at the centre of the “climategate” email scandal has revealed that he was so traumatised by the global backlash against him that he contemplated suicide. Jones, 57, said he was unprepared for the scandal: “I am just a scientist. I have no training in PR or dealing with crises.”Actually, he's using the term "scientist" loosely there, given that real scientists don't do what he did. And while he may not have any training dealing with crises, he sure was good at generating one: it was called the global warming crisis.
Views: 146 Comments: 3
Views: 112 Comments: 3
Views: 123 Comments: 3
When I woke up this morning and saw this on TV I wanted to puke. The problem with a lot of workers in this country is just this kind of mentality. "they screwed me out of xyz dollars". Bullshit. You screwed yourself. I've said it often and I'll say it again, the only thing a company HAS to pay you is the minimum wage. Everything after that is up to you.
I guarantee you that you walk up to any HR recruiter with any set of high demand skills and say you will work for minimum wage some company is not going to say "that is too low, we'll pay you more". Not likely.
If you know for a fact that you are making less than someone else (the knowledge of which is usually a no-no in most companies) and the company won't match it, assuming all else is equal, then leave and work for someone who will pay you what you want.
Litigation attorneys are going to love this one. We have the ambulance chasers, now we'll have the retiree chasers.