
by: Clyde Middleton posted: 2009-06-28 17:17:00
Viewed 580 times. 10 Comments.
"Mike" is Suspect #2 in the Waxman-Markey defection.
It's a personal thing with me, but I like people that go by the name they were given at birth. Sorry to all your alternative Michaels out there, but "Mike" seems to me to be indicative of a weak spirit (this only applies to him - I don't like him. If you're a Michael, feel free to use Mike - sounds good. Strong). So this guy sucks even before I write anything about him. Onward.
"Mike" represents that great state of Delaware. You know the state - it's the one that pulled the stunt to become the first state after lying to Benny Franklin that they'd wait so Pennsylvania could have that honor. Speaking of liars, Pennsylvania got its revenge by vomiting ten-year old Joey Biden into Delaware's coffers. Yeah, same state. That's gonna leave a stain hard to remove. Try some white vinegar.
His by-far largest contributor in the 2008 cycle was "Young, Conaway et al." Y-C is a law firm primarily focused on Bankruptcy and Corporate Restructuring. It's comforting to know that "Mike" got fully 10% of his campaign contributions from these guys since "Mike" sits on the Financial Services Committee. Comes in handy.
Drifting into other areas in which "Mike" has sold his soul to Beelzebub, I find it instructive that Planned Parenthood gives him a rating of 75, while the National Right to Life Committee gives him the goose egg -0-. This guy's a Republican?
Further on interest-group rating, wheat growers dislike him (25), farmers are skeptical (37), agricultural employers would rather have manure-spreading duty (-0-) (trust me, it sucks - talk about stains that are tough to get out), and fresh produce would rather spend the night in the field with gas heaters to ward off a freeze (-0-).
Surely he helps hunters, right? Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance: -0-.
It seems "Mike" isn't very pro-the-stuff-we-need-to-eat unless, of course, the stuff-we-need-to-eat is dead babies. What a douche.
Taxes? National Taxpayers Union -D-. His shining light: National Education Association -A-. Good for him. He's loved by the group that single-handedly destroyed the public-school system. The American Family Association tosses a shoe at him (-0-) and the Family Research Council manages a measly 23.
Onto the litmus test: That machined and polished metal that you will remove from my cold, dead fingers ... the 2d Amendment personal right to be locked and loaded. National Rifle Association gave "Mike" a grade of F, and the Gun Owners of America gave him ... wait for it .. a rating of F-. F MINUS?!?! Have the hell bad to do you have to be to add a MINUS to an F. Oh my fricking lord.
He won his last election 61-38, but he raised over $1.4 million compared to $27,845 by his challenger. I'm not impressed with 11 points into simple-majority territory at the cost per vote.
Remember Vote 99: H CON RES 63 way back in February 2007? Let me refresh your memory:
This measure expresses the House's disagreement with President Bush's planned troop buildup in Iraq. The nonbinding resolution pledges support for U.S. personnel serving "bravely and honorably in Iraq" but says Congress "disapproves" of the president?s plan to add more than 20,000 combat troops. The resolution was approved 246 to 182. Seventeen Republicans joined 229 Democrats in support of the resolution. Two Democrats opposed the measure. While the 95-word resolution has no legal weight to force the president to change his course in Iraq, it marks a first key showdown between the White House and the new Congress controlled by Democrats.
"Mike" voted FOR this claptrap. "Love the troops, hate them doing their job," eh, "Mike"? You putz.
Same link as above: He also voted to tax oil companies, drive drug companies overseas by depth-charging their market-driven pricing mechanism, and to spike youth unemployment by increasing the minimum wage - all against the party line. Why is he in the Republican party?
Conclusion: Putz. Makes Arlen Specter looks good. He's gotta go.
Trackback url: http://patriotroom.com/article/profiles-in-cowardice--mike--castle/trackback
Flake does not need to go. An entire Congress full of Jeff Flakes would result in a freer America than we've had in decades.
Thing is, the Democrats who run against Mr Castle are even worse tha he is. Serious Democrats (mostly) leave him alone, because it's not worth the effort to try to unseat him, and the Republican leadership likes him because he wins; they don't seem to think about the legislative results of his victories.
The Republican Party leadership also stood up in 2004, with President Bush and then-Senator Rick Santorum backing Senator Arlen Specter in his close primary7 battle with Representative Pat Toomey, a real conservative. Senator Specyer won by 4% of the vote, but we can see now just what good it has done us.
Good point, Dana. But my position is this - the old republican party just isn't cutting it anymore. It is no longer conservative. For me, I left the party several years ago - when I felt they had left my values behind.
I know the party money arguments, etc. But I am not backing a non-conservative, regardless of the party. Those days are over.
Lol!
Clyde,
You dope. You picked the one vote in which Castle voted against Bush on the Iraq war. He is a down line party man conservative when his vote matters. Look at his record over the past 8 years when the question was not settled. It will warm your black little heart.
Bottom Line: You've been hoodwinked, just like Dana and the other stupid suckers in Delaware who keep voting for this conservative closet case.
I picked one vote? Duh? You see his ratings by the interest groups? Those are based on accumulated positions. You want to vote for this RINO, that's your privilege. I'm a conservative - and Castle isn't.
Correction to my last comment:
When it comes to being the sworn enemy of the gun owners and fetus Americans Mike Castle is not a dependable conservative vote.
Even on abortion and guns, if Tom Delay or George Bush asked for his vote they would have it.
I'd say he is neither conservative or liberal, but a craven valueless politician with his eyes fixed on opinion polls and the next election.
Agreed on the latter part, yes. And I suggest that the broader problem with the pubs is that they left values behind and followed polls - which themselves are suspect based upon the proclivities of the pollster, the funding organization, and so on.
I'm just tired, Jason, of politicians that don't support my values. I am not compromising anymore. It isn't a threat or litmus test or anything of the sort. I'm a conservative, and to me there is no difference between Castle and a dem in office. Just not voting that way anymore.
Back in November, the House passed its health care bill by a narrow 220 to 215 margin, with 39 Democrats voting against it. Since then, the one Republican who voted for it ? Joseph Cao ? has indicated that he would not support the bill a second time around given the weaker language on abortion in the Senate version. In addition, Florida Rep. Robert Wexler already retired prematurely. Factor in Murtha?s death today, and Pelosi is down to 217 votes ? one short of passage. To pass the bill at some point in the next few months, she?ll need to flip a Democrat who is already on record voting against the bill.
Views: 113 Comments: 0
Don't think that Republicans can't be sucked in when an anti-Wall Street lynch mob gets its blood up. Recall that Sarbanes-Oxley, the devastating antigrowth response in 2002 to the Enron and Worldcom scandals, was passed with virtually unanimous support by Republicans in Congress, and signed by a Republican president. Recall that last year 85 House Republicans voted for a 90% tax on bonuses for any employee of any bank that took more than $5 billion in TARP money. Investors got some good news last Friday. Stocks resisted following through on Thursday's sharp plunge after (Congress) reached an impasse on bank re-regulation. That's a nice down payment on what investors need a lot more of now: proof that the GOP won't join Democrats in a populist rush to seek revenge against Wall Street.
Views: 77 Comments: 3
Just two years after Mr. Obama helped his party pull in record Wall Street contributions ? $89 million from the securities and investment business, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics ? some of his biggest supporters, like Mr. Dimon, have become the industry?s chief lobbyists against his regulatory agenda. Republicans are rushing to capitalize on what they call Wall Street?s ?buyer?s remorse? with the Democrats. And industry executives and lobbyists are warning Democrats that if Mr. Obama keeps attacking Wall Street ?fat cats,? they may fight back by withholding their cash.
Views: 78 Comments: 2
The Dow, down almost 104 points, had its 10th triple-digit move in 16 trading days. Shares of big banks pulled the market lower, extending a slump that has led to four straight weekly losses.I can't, for the life of me, understand why bank stocks would be dropping. Inexplicable.
Views: 57 Comments: 2
Contrary to President Obama's promises, voters say special interests have more influence on the political process now than they did a year ago, according to a new poll. The poll, paid for by groups looking to curb the Supreme Court's recent campaign finance ruling, found that majorities of both Republicans and Democrats say special interests have increased their influence since the president took office, and they say Mr. Obama has not done enough to fight back.
Views: 58 Comments: 1
If the starting point for this meeting is the job-killing bills the American people have already soundly rejected, Republicans would rightly be reluctant to participate,? the pair explained in a letter to White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. They also said President Barack Obama should remove reconciliation from the table. Using budget reconciliation rules to move healthcare reform in the Senate would mean Democrats would only need 51 votes on procedural measures instead of 60... On Sunday afternoon however, Obama refused to say he would start from scratch.
Views: 64 Comments: 2
An announcement from his office said Murtha died at 1:18 p.m. at the Virginia Hospital Center, where he had been admitted last week after having his gallbladder removed at Bethesda Naval Hospital.
Views: 164 Comments: 5
The scientist at the centre of the ?climategate? email scandal has revealed that he was so traumatised by the global backlash against him that he contemplated suicide. Jones, 57, said he was unprepared for the scandal: ?I am just a scientist. I have no training in PR or dealing with crises.?Actually, he's using the term "scientist" loosely there, given that real scientists don't do what he did. And while he may not have any training dealing with crises, he sure was good at generating one: it was called the global warming crisis.
Views: 146 Comments: 3
Views: 112 Comments: 3
Views: 123 Comments: 3
You are so right, all eight have to go! Plus the two that didn't vote at all, Flake-AZ and
Sullivan-OK. I can't wait for your Coward "Suspect #3". Thanks for putting them in their place.