On Politics, We Can Always See the Whites of Their Eyes.
Richard Cohen: Okay, So Bush Reads a Lot - He's Still an Idiot
by: Bill Dupray posted: 2008-12-30 09:38:00
Viewed 764 times. 7 Comments.
Note: Welcome Conservative Grapevine readers. Thanks to John Hawkins for making Patriot Room today's Blog of the Day.
You can't win with these guys. The smarter-than-everyone-else libs mock George W. Bush for 8 years as a syntax-twisting, moron cowboy. Now we find out that Bush is a prolific reader of histories, biographies, and classics. And Richard Cohen responds with an "Oh yeah, well I am still smarter" column.
In what without a doubt is the most astounding op-ed piece of the year, Karl Rove reveals that his friend and former boss, George W. Bush, has read probably hundreds of books over the course of his presidency. One of them was Albert Camus' "The Stranger," with its unforgettable opening lines: "Mother died today. Or perhaps it was yesterday, I don't know." After reading Rove's Wall Street Journal column, it's clear there's much we all don't know. . . .In his column, Rove says that Bush read 95 books in 2006 alone. In 2007, he read 51 books and as of last week, he had read 40 in 2008. The numbers are precise because Bush challenged Rove to a contest: who could read the most books. Rove always won, but Bush had the ready excuse that he was, as he put it, busy being "Leader of the Free World." This, though, is not an excuse. As Dwight Eisenhower once told me (I'm not making this up), he had more time as president to dabble in painting than he did in retirement. Such is the virtue of The Bubble.
Think about what Cohen is saying. The President of the United States has read 186 books in the last three years. This is more books than most people will read in their entire lives, and more than anybody that I know has read during that time. The guy was also President and fought two wars, the Democrats, and the media for eight years. But, to Cohen, that's nothing - Bush lives in The Bubble.
Curiously missing from Cohen's piece was the entire list of books he has read in the last three years. I suppose it would be shorter though. He is a busy newspaper columnist, not some layabout like the President of the United States.
And the funny part is that Cohen is a goal-post mover. So when the sheer number of books blows a hole in the Libs' caricature of Bush as an idiot, Cohen retorts that the kinds of books Bush reads still make him a narrow minded idiot. And he then blames the newly-discredited idiot cowboy image on Rove and Bush.
It is awfully late in the day for Rove -- and, presumably, Bush -- to assert the president's intellectual bona fides. Now feeling the hot breath of history, they are dropping the good ol' boy persona and picking up the ol' bifocals one. But the books themselves reveal -- actually, confirm -- something about Bush that maybe Rove did not intend. They are not the reading of a widely read man, but instead the books of a man who seeks -- and sees -- vindication in every page. Bush has always been the captive of fixed ideas. His books just support that.The list Rove provides is long, but it is narrow. It lacks whole shelves of books on how and why the Iraq war was a mistake, one that metastasized into a debacle. . . .
My hat is off to Bush for the sheer volume and, often, high quality of his reading. But his books reflect a man who is seeking to learn what he already knows. The caricature of Bush as unread died today -- or was it yesterday? But the reality of the intellectually insulated man endures.
I wonder if Richard Cohen has ever read any right wing blogs.
Probably not. Intellectually insulated men only read about stuff they like.
Tags: Richard Cohen, George W. Bush, Books, Karl Rove, MSM, Liberals,
Related Articles
- The confusing life of a too-conscious liberal
- Wait just a minute: Rahm is the HERO, not the villain?
- Nanny Michelle Obama: Childhood Obesity is a National Security Threat; Now give us your tax dollars and your freedoms so we can protect you from yourselves.
- Glenn Beck on the "Progressive" Income Tax
Links to this post
Trackback url: http://patriotroom.com/article/richard-cohen--okay--so-bush-reads-a-lot---he-s-still-an-idiot/trackback
Comments 7
Just reading the last part of Cohen's article that you have posted says volumes about his philosophy and outlook on life. Cohen is holding up a mirror to his own soul in the words that he pinned about our President and Cohen is too clueless to know that by his words we see him more clearly than the person Cohen is writing about.
"But the reality of the intellectually insulated man endures. " the smugness of these people is hard to endure.
Sure never thought Camus was a "captive of fixed ideas". Didn't he and Sartre spread the "gospel" of existentialism? I would've thought Cohen was a disciple of that movement. After all, it was godless and fixated on the "absurdity of life". Sounds like a good description of 21st century liberalism to me...
I didn't like Bush as president but the sheer amount of reading he's done is truly impressive. More people in this country should turn off the tv (like John Stewart and Bill Maher's claptrap) and follow his lead. It just might produce critical thinkers.
That reminds me that I need to get back to doing more reading myself, like I used to when I was a kid.
Do you know anybody that has read more in that time period who is not in school? I don't.
Have an opinion?
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
Publius' Newsstand
-
Conference of Bishops: It is the unanimous view...
Do we really need to state the obvious? Laws are made and changed in the Legislative Branch, not the Executive. Only in dictatorships are laws made by the Executive Branch.According to these rulings, such health legislation creates a statutory requirement for abortion funding, unless Congress clearly forbids such funding. That is why the Hyde amendment was needed in 1976, to stop Medicaid from funding 300,000 abortions a year. The statutory mandate construed by the courts would override any executive order or regulation. This is the unanimous view of our legal advisors and of the experts we have consulted on abortion jurisprudence. Only a change in the law enacted by Congress, not an executive order, can begin to address this very serious problem in the legislation."
Views: 69 Comments: 0
-
Breaking: Hoyer - We don't have the votes yet
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) predicted Sunday that Democrats will have the votes to pass the massive health care bill later in the day, but he suggested a number of crucial Members were still undecided. “There are still Members looking at it and trying to make up their minds, but we think there are going to be 216-plus votes when we call the roll,” Hoyer said on NBC’s "Meet the Press.” He added, "We’re going to pass this bill.” Hoyer said the remaining votes the Democrats need are “in the low single digits, certainly.”Views: 86 Comments: 0
-
Senate bill requires 67 vote supermajority to k...
So the Dems now want to decide who lives and who dies so badly, they have rigged the rules to require 67 votes to kill the death panels. Keep in mind this is the same number of votes needed to pass a Constitutional Amendment.[Democrats] have inserted . . . a provision that it would take a supermajority of 67 votes in the Senate for future legislative bodies to even consider amendments to its provisions for "death panels." . . . The bill states, "It shall not be in order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment, or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection." That subsection addresses rules and regulations that doctors would be ordered to follow by the "Independent Medicare Advisory Boards a/k/a the Death Panels," RedState reported.
Views: 72 Comments: 1
-
Dems trash Tricare, start losing votes: Nye is ...
Remember, these are the people who bristle when you say they do not support the troops and question their patriotism. Democrat Glen Nye (Va) says he's not that kind of Democrat.The original version of legislation in the House had specifically exempted TRICARE from being affected. However, when the final bill language was released on Thursday afternoon, it was revealed that neither the Senate bill nor the reconciliation package contained an exemption for TRICARE. “Our military families need to be able to count on their health care benefits, and I am not willing to risk negative consequences for our military personnel and their families, particularly at a time when our troops are serving overseas in harm’s way,” said Nye.
Views: 59 Comments: 0
-
Stupak this morning: Until we have a deal on ab...
The possible deal would focus on an executive order that would specify there would be no public funding for abortions in the healthcare bill. "We're close but we're not there yet," Stupak said. Democratic leaders said Sunday they have the votes on healthcare reform, but Stupak said until there is a deal struck, they don't have the 216 votes they need. Stupak said "there were eight of us" in the negotiating room, all of them no votes.Views: 45 Comments: 3
-
Waxman: No 'Deem and Pass' - We pass the Senate...
Hmmm. If Demon Pass is dead (and it is dead according to multiple sources), then they either have the votes and we are just waiting for it, or they would rather lose on an up or down vote so as to avoid the appearance of being Enemies of the State. Since the meeting broke down into chaos, one wonders if they actually have the votes.The problem is the sequence. Can the House vote to amend something that isn't the law, as the Senate bill will not be law before the president's signature? The Rules Committee meeting turned into mass confusion when Democratic Rep. Henry Waxman said, "We're not going to 'deem' the bill passed. We're going to pass the Senate bill…I would be against the idea of 'deeming' something -- we either pass it or we don't."
Views: 96 Comments: 4
-
Rep. Altmire confirms: NO
Nancy has about run out of "yes" votes: Congressman Jason Altmire will vote against the latest version of health care reform when the U.S. House of Representatives votes on the bill this weekend. Altmire confirmed that he has decided to vote no in a telephone conversation with KDKA Political Editor Jon Delano. The McCandless Democrat is expected to post a statement on his website later today.Views: 112 Comments: 0
-
JIP: Obama Approval Under Disapproval on RCP
Tough to be Barry: Real Clear Politics, or RCP for short, is a news site that averages approval/disapproval polls together, forming a very non-partisan system. For the last year and change, I have closely watched the approval of the President. Slowly but surely, it kept going lower and lower and lower. The President was at his peak on January 29, 2009 with an approval of 63.5 and a disapproval of only 19.3, a 44.2% difference. From the beginning of March to the end of June, Obama's approval/disapproval held moderately steady. But then it happened. The President began calling for radical reforms to the American Health Care System. While reform is needed, this "change" that the President was peddling did not sit well with the American people.Views: 200 Comments: 0
-
Will House recon bill surive intact in Senate? ...
Very clear. Toast: FTA: Senate Budget Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) said Thursday that it is unlikely the Senate will be able to pass a health care reconciliation bill unchanged from what the House passes. Conrad said the Senate Parliamentarian has declined to make rulings on several issues in the bill that Republicans are likely to challenge under the “Byrd rule.” That rule states that, among other things, every provision of a budget reconciliation bill must have a budget impact and cannot be “extraneous.” “Although we’ve spent many, many hours with the Parliamentarian, some things he has not yet rendered a conclusion” on, Conrad said. “He wants to hear from both sides before he does.” Conrad continued: “Do I expect there will be some additional Byrd rule challenges that will be upheld? Yeah. I do.”Views: 105 Comments: 1
-
Another flip from Yes to No: Rep. Michael Arcur...
Rep. Mike Arcuri (D., N.Y.), a sophomore who had a tough go of it in 2008, will vote nay on Obamacare, both on the House floor and in the Rules Committee. The Rules vote is symbolic, since Democrats outnumber Republicans there two-to-one. But the floor vote could go either way. It is obviously a blow to Pelosi's chances of hitting 216.Views: 176 Comments: 0
Get Your PR Button!
More Articles By Bill Dupray
- Conference of Bishops: It is the unanimous view of our legal advisors and experts that an Executive Order on abortion is of no legal effect
on 2010-03-21 with 69 views - Breaking: Hoyer - We don't have the votes yet
on 2010-03-21 with 86 views - Senate bill requires 67 vote supermajority to kill death panels
on 2010-03-21 with 72 views - Dems trash Tricare, start losing votes: Nye is a 'No'
on 2010-03-21 with 59 views - Stupak this morning: Until we have a deal on abortion, they don't have the votes
on 2010-03-21 with 45 views - How Obamacare dies: NOT buying health insurance is NOT Interstate Commerce
on 2010-03-20 with 484 views - Waxman: No 'Deem and Pass' - We pass the Senate bill or we don't
on 2010-03-20 with 96 views - Another flip from Yes to No: Rep. Michael Arcuri (D-NY)
on 2010-03-18 with 176 views - CBO: Actually, those defict reduction figures are pretty much guesses
on 2010-03-18 with 151 views - Update on CBO: Corrupt Dem leaders touting unofficial numbers
on 2010-03-18 with 140 views
Surfing blogs. Found this one. I like it. Witty.