
by: Robert McIntosh posted: 2009-09-28 12:14:00
Viewed 666 times. 1 Comments.
The Daily Express in the UK is reporting that the Saudi's will OK the use of their airspace to Israel for an attack on Iran's nuke facilities.
The site is seen as a major threat by Tel Aviv and Riyadh. Details of the talks emerged after John Bolton, America’s former UN ambassador, told a meeting of intelligence analysts that “Riyadh certainly approves” of Israel’s use of Saudi airspace.
The new facility near Qom has raised many concerns, even with Russia, which has resisted sanctions on Iran, called the new facility "disturbing".
What isn't reported however is that if Israel uses Saudi airspace, that means the U.S. will likely coordinate or at the very least watch carefully exactly what is going on. How? Well, the U.S. has AWACS (Airborne Warning And Control System) in Saudi. These aircraft are basically airborne air traffic control, and they see everything. Less than a week ago Iran's only AWACS fell upon misfortune.
Take these developments in conjunction with Iran's missile test today, and it seems like a strike is almost imminent.
Tags: Iran,
Trackback url: http://patriotroom.com/article/saudi-arabia-oks-airspace-for-israel-attack-on-iran/trackback
According to these rulings, such health legislation creates a statutory requirement for abortion funding, unless Congress clearly forbids such funding. That is why the Hyde amendment was needed in 1976, to stop Medicaid from funding 300,000 abortions a year. The statutory mandate construed by the courts would override any executive order or regulation. This is the unanimous view of our legal advisors and of the experts we have consulted on abortion jurisprudence. Only a change in the law enacted by Congress, not an executive order, can begin to address this very serious problem in the legislation."
Views: 69 Comments: 0
Views: 86 Comments: 0
[Democrats] have inserted . . . a provision that it would take a supermajority of 67 votes in the Senate for future legislative bodies to even consider amendments to its provisions for "death panels." . . . The bill states, "It shall not be in order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment, or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection." That subsection addresses rules and regulations that doctors would be ordered to follow by the "Independent Medicare Advisory Boards a/k/a the Death Panels," RedState reported.
Views: 74 Comments: 1
The original version of legislation in the House had specifically exempted TRICARE from being affected. However, when the final bill language was released on Thursday afternoon, it was revealed that neither the Senate bill nor the reconciliation package contained an exemption for TRICARE. “Our military families need to be able to count on their health care benefits, and I am not willing to risk negative consequences for our military personnel and their families, particularly at a time when our troops are serving overseas in harm’s way,” said Nye.
Views: 59 Comments: 0
Views: 46 Comments: 3
The problem is the sequence. Can the House vote to amend something that isn't the law, as the Senate bill will not be law before the president's signature? The Rules Committee meeting turned into mass confusion when Democratic Rep. Henry Waxman said, "We're not going to 'deem' the bill passed. We're going to pass the Senate bill…I would be against the idea of 'deeming' something -- we either pass it or we don't."
Views: 96 Comments: 4
Views: 113 Comments: 0
Views: 200 Comments: 0
Views: 105 Comments: 1
Views: 176 Comments: 0
Hah! You can always count on religious nuts, Wahabis will always hate those Shiites and if it takes siding with a mortal Jewish enemy - so be it. Last thing the Sunnis need is a Shiite nuclear Iran.
This makes perfect sense.
A little sad that Israel cannot rely on it's best friend and fly through Iraq, but then again, it's a toss up between an average Saudi and Obama.