
by: Clyde Middleton posted: 2009-10-12 18:49:00
Viewed 391 times. 3 Comments.
There's a bill coming to the Senate floor this Thursday. It makes sense on many levels - as surprising as that is in the US Senate - but we still need to tell our senators how to vote.
Here's the nudge I got in an e-mail from Pandora:
The radio royalty system as it stands today is fundamentally unfair both to Internet radio services like Pandora, which pay far higher royalties than other forms of radio and to performing musicians, who receive no compensation when their music is played on AM/FM radio. There is a very important vote in the Senate this coming Thursday, October 15th, on a piece of legislation that represents a potentially major step forward in correcting both of these issues - establishing both a more level playing field across all radio and ensuring that artists are fairly compensated.
From that brief statement, it seems that there needs to be parity so the free market can operate as designed - no one get's either punished or treated differently than anyone else providing the same product or service in the same industry. Push aside your first thought (if it was the same as mine) - internet-based stations do not have a lock on broadcasting on the net. Plenty of ground-based stations have both local airwaves and streams. If anything, ground stations have a lock on the local scene, and share equally the internet.
What exactly is going on? Jennifer Bendall, executive director of musicFIRST, sums it up rather quickly:
It's unfair, unjustified and un-American that artists and musicians are paid absolutely nothing when their recordings are played on AM and FM radio. Music is their work, their livelihood. They deserve fair pay for air play.
The article goes on:
The Performance Rights Act will close an archaic provision of America's copyright law that allows AM and FM radio stations to earn $16 billion a year in advertising revenue without compensating the artists and musicians who bring music to life and listeners' ears to the radio dial....
AM and FM radio is the only music platform that does not pay a fair performance right to artists and musicians for the use of their work. Satellite, cable and internet radio compensate artists when they play their music. AM and FM radio however receives a free pass to broadcast the recordings of thousands of artists and musicians every day without paying them a penny.
Seems fair - everyone pays or no one pays. And since copyright law is actually written into the US Constitution, it would seem appropriate that it be honored - so all stations that play music, ergo profit off the creative work of someone else, should pay for the privilege.
Let's look at the proposed law. The heart of it changed language to existing law. I've shown the changes by strikeout of deleted language and bold of new language
§ 106. Exclusive rights in copyrighted worksSubject to sections 107 through 122, the owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following: ... (6) in the case of sound recordings, to perform the copyrighted work publicly by means of
a digitalaudio transmission.§ 114. Scope of exclusive rights in sound recordings
(d) Limitations on Exclusive Right. — Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106(6) —
(1) Exempt transmissions and retransmissions. — The performance of a sound recording publicly by means of
a digitalan audio transmission, other than as a part of an interactive service, is not an infringement of section 106(6) if the performance is part of —
(A) a nonsubscription broadcast transmission;...
(2) Statutory licensing of certain transmissions. —
The performance of a sound recording publicly by means of a subscription digital audio transmission not exempt under paragraph (1), an eligible nonsubscription transmission, or a transmission not exempt under paragraph (1) that is made by a preexisting satellite digital audio radio service shall be subject to statutory licensing, in accordance with
subsection (f) ifsubsection (f) if, other than for a nonsubscription and noninteractive broadcast transmission, —(A)(i) the transmission is not part of an interactive service;
OK, we could go on. They are red-lining out the "digital" concept. There is additional language for maximum fees for small broadcasters (less than $1.25 million in revenue) - they pay a fixed $5,000 a year.
By striking "digital," it seems that the analog transmission of radio stations would now be included in the requirement to pay royalties. I am not qualified (nor do I want to be) to distinguish "digital" from "high definition" that I hear local stations claim that they broadcast.
Going back to the article cited in the opening, I find this statement compelling: "And because the U.S. doesn't have a performance right, foreign stations do not have to pay American artists when their music is played on stations around the globe -- an inequity that costs American artists tens of millions of dollars each year."
There are two issues, it seems. First, some broadcasters are required to pay royalties - Pandora, for example - while other broadcasters of the same creative work for substantially the same purpose are not required to pay royalties. Second, artists are having their creative work used to profit 3d parties, and no portion of that profit is given to the artist.
I think this proposed law does what it should: Corrects both market anomolies.
Let your senator know how you feel before Thursday, October 15, 2009.
Trackback url: http://patriotroom.com/article/senate-action-coming-10-15-9-performance-rights-act/trackback
It's been a couple of decades since I was in radio broadcasting, however we used to audit our playlists every quarter for BMI and ASCAP label rights for which the station paid a fee. Those entities then paid royalties to owners of the music, composers, lyricists, ect. Has that changed?
Yes, it did change. AM/FM have been royalty free for quite a while.
Iran said Tuesday that it had begun producing higher-grade enriched uranium, marking a new and potentially dangerous turn in Tehran's confrontation with the West over its nuclear ambitions... U.S. National Intelligence Director Dennis C. Blair told the House intelligence committee last week that "Iran has the scientific, the technical, the industrial capacity to produce enough highly enriched uranium for a weapon in the next few years and eventually to produce a nuclear weapon. The central issue is a political decision by Iran to do so."
Views: 18 Comments: 0
I wouldn't want my fingerprints on anything this administration or congress proposes. Reid told reporters the bill would be introduced on Tuesday, and that it would include an extension of the tax breaks... Reid did not say how expensive the jobs bill would be. The Senate had been considering a package of roughly $80 billion. The House passed a larger jobs bill before Christmas, but now plans to unveil a different bill independent of that package, which did not garner Republican support.
Views: 52 Comments: 0
Back in November, the House passed its health care bill by a narrow 220 to 215 margin, with 39 Democrats voting against it. Since then, the one Republican who voted for it — Joseph Cao — has indicated that he would not support the bill a second time around given the weaker language on abortion in the Senate version. In addition, Florida Rep. Robert Wexler already retired prematurely. Factor in Murtha’s death today, and Pelosi is down to 217 votes — one short of passage. To pass the bill at some point in the next few months, she’ll need to flip a Democrat who is already on record voting against the bill.
Views: 121 Comments: 1
Don't think that Republicans can't be sucked in when an anti-Wall Street lynch mob gets its blood up. Recall that Sarbanes-Oxley, the devastating antigrowth response in 2002 to the Enron and Worldcom scandals, was passed with virtually unanimous support by Republicans in Congress, and signed by a Republican president. Recall that last year 85 House Republicans voted for a 90% tax on bonuses for any employee of any bank that took more than $5 billion in TARP money. Investors got some good news last Friday. Stocks resisted following through on Thursday's sharp plunge after (Congress) reached an impasse on bank re-regulation. That's a nice down payment on what investors need a lot more of now: proof that the GOP won't join Democrats in a populist rush to seek revenge against Wall Street.
Views: 78 Comments: 3
Just two years after Mr. Obama helped his party pull in record Wall Street contributions — $89 million from the securities and investment business, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics — some of his biggest supporters, like Mr. Dimon, have become the industry’s chief lobbyists against his regulatory agenda. Republicans are rushing to capitalize on what they call Wall Street’s “buyer’s remorse” with the Democrats. And industry executives and lobbyists are warning Democrats that if Mr. Obama keeps attacking Wall Street “fat cats,” they may fight back by withholding their cash.
Views: 78 Comments: 2
The Dow, down almost 104 points, had its 10th triple-digit move in 16 trading days. Shares of big banks pulled the market lower, extending a slump that has led to four straight weekly losses.I can't, for the life of me, understand why bank stocks would be dropping. Inexplicable.
Views: 57 Comments: 2
Contrary to President Obama's promises, voters say special interests have more influence on the political process now than they did a year ago, according to a new poll. The poll, paid for by groups looking to curb the Supreme Court's recent campaign finance ruling, found that majorities of both Republicans and Democrats say special interests have increased their influence since the president took office, and they say Mr. Obama has not done enough to fight back.
Views: 59 Comments: 1
If the starting point for this meeting is the job-killing bills the American people have already soundly rejected, Republicans would rightly be reluctant to participate,” the pair explained in a letter to White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. They also said President Barack Obama should remove reconciliation from the table. Using budget reconciliation rules to move healthcare reform in the Senate would mean Democrats would only need 51 votes on procedural measures instead of 60... On Sunday afternoon however, Obama refused to say he would start from scratch.
Views: 65 Comments: 2
An announcement from his office said Murtha died at 1:18 p.m. at the Virginia Hospital Center, where he had been admitted last week after having his gallbladder removed at Bethesda Naval Hospital.
Views: 166 Comments: 6
The scientist at the centre of the “climategate” email scandal has revealed that he was so traumatised by the global backlash against him that he contemplated suicide. Jones, 57, said he was unprepared for the scandal: “I am just a scientist. I have no training in PR or dealing with crises.”Actually, he's using the term "scientist" loosely there, given that real scientists don't do what he did. And while he may not have any training dealing with crises, he sure was good at generating one: it was called the global warming crisis.
Views: 146 Comments: 3
You mean they might have gotten something right?!! That's kinda scary.