
by: Bill Dupray posted: 2009-03-17 17:36:00
Viewed 664 times. 10 Comments.
Hey Barry, this was your bag of manure. Maybe if you had read the thing before you signed it, you wouldn't have to pretend that AIG somehow violated your law.
From But As For Me.
[W]e discovered that Obama granted AIG a free legal pass to give high bonuses because of the following stipulation in Obama’s stimulus bill he personally orchestrated and signed into law:From page H1412 of the Final Stimulus Bill, “SEC. 111. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE:
“(iii) The prohibition required under clause (i) shall not be construed to prohibit any bonus payment required to be paid pursuant to a written employment contract executed on or before February 11, 2009, as such valid employment contracts are determined by the Secretary or the designee of the Secretary.”
This amendment provides an exception for contractually obligated bonuses agreed on before Feb. 11, 2009, which exempts the very AIG bonuses Obama is condemning every single chance he gets. The amendment is in the final version and is law.
So all of Obama's bleating and faux anger about the bonuses appears to be rooted in regret over either his own incompetence or getting caught in a poltical sh*t-storm of his own making. Or both.
Either way it makes his statement from yesterday ring a little hollow now.
"This is a corporation that finds itself in financial distress due to recklessness and greed," Obama told a group of small business owners."I mean, how do they justify this outrage to the taxpayers who are keeping the company afloat?"
Mr. President, they justify it by following your law.
Trackback url: http://patriotroom.com/article/stimulus-explicitly-protects-bonuses-obama-now-laments--/trackback
The problem is, as usual, why doesn't somebody in the MSM just ask Obama point blank, "Didn't the stimulus allow these bonuses, and, if so, isn't that your mistake, Mr. President, for allowing them, not AIG's for taking them?"
Nah, that would be asking them to do their jobs. Far too tall an order in the Age of Obama.
Oh sure they can go ahead and submit that question for pre-approval ahead of the scripted faux press conference, but that question will never make it through the pre-screening special selection process.
It's worth noting that this little gem was inserted into the Stimulus by none other than Senator Christopher Dodd (D-CT) and paid for by the generous campaign contributions he receives from AIG and its employees.
The hypocrisy of the Democrats knows no bounds.
That's fine. The more press he gets, the more the GOP has a chance to pick him off next year. It has been a while since we have seen (R. CT) after a Senator's name.
BTW, is your governor going to lose in the fall?
Man, I sure hope Corzine loses in November. He's trailing former US Attorney Chris Christie by 10+ points in the polls right now. The problem with the NJ GOP is they almost always manage to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. There is so much infighting they can't articulate a consistent message. The leadership is dominated by RINOs and the rank and file who vote in primaries are overwhelmingly conservative. So if a conservative candidate emerges from the primary the leadership only gives him half-hearted support.
WYBLOG................Here's a story on those campaign contributions you mentioned.
The story "Obama Receives $101,332 Bonus from AIG" can be found at:
www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2009/03/17/obama-received-a-101332-bonus-from-aig/
Hold the phone! Yesterday I was demanding the head of Dodd on a platter, but today...
It actually is being reported in Salon that Dodd is being double crossed and scapegoated by the WH covering its own ass.
” The accusation against Dodd is that there is nothing the Obama administration can do about the AIG bonus payments because Dodd inserted a clause into the stimulus bill which exempted executive compensation agreements entered into before February, 2009 from the compensation limits imposed on firms receiving bailout funds. Thus, this accusation asserts, it was Dodd’s amendment which explicitly allowed firms like AIG to make bonus payments that were promised before the stimulus bill was enacted.
That is simply not what happened. What actually happened is the opposite. It was Dodd who did everything possible — including writing and advocating for an amendment — which would have applied the limitations on executive compensation to all bailout-receiving firms, including AIG, and applied it to all future bonus payments without regard to when those payments were promised. But it was Tim Geithner and Larry Summers who openly criticized Dodd’s proposal at the time and insisted that those limitations should apply only to future compensation contracts, not ones that already existed. The exemption for already existing compensation agreements — the exact provision that is now protecting the AIG bonus payments — was inserted at the White House’s insistence and over Dodd’s objections. But now that a political scandal has erupted over these payments, the White House is trying to deflect blame from itself and heap it all on Chris Dodd by claiming that it was Dodd who was responsible for that exemption.”
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/03/17/dodd/
Wow, eh?
The legislation apparently originally passed with Sen. Olympia Snowe's (RINO - ME) amendment banning the bonuses. According to this, http://tinyurl.com/dcowmj , Geithner and the White House got the Dems to drop it in the middle of the night. Dodd claims it wasn't him. If it wasn't, did someone from his office do it? He's the banking guy for crying out loud. He's the boss. He takes the fall for not getting it back in.
Most importantly, we need the name of the person who stripped it out, just so we know where to place the tar and feathers. Why don't we start applying tar to Dodd until he talks?
Do you think that if maybe any of anyone in Congress had actually READ the Stimulus Bill before voting for it that just maybe someone would have some idea what it did or didn't say....???
The share of the blame comes as cracks are beginning to show in Emanuel’s once-impregnable political armor... on Capitol Hill he’s under fire for poor execution of the president’s healthcare agenda in the Senate... Senate Democrats grilled White House advisers last week during a special Senate Democratic retreat, expressing frustration over the lack of a clear plan. While Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) ripped chief political strategist David Axelrod, Senate Democrats say Emanuel, who was more closely involved in managing negotiations in Congress, also deserves scrutiny.
Views: 1 Comments: 0
Michelle Obama defended her husband against some of his most vocal critics, saying President Obama did a "phenomenal" job this year and that change is a long-term process. The first lady talks about her nationwide campaign called "Let's Move." "I think my husband has done a phenomenal job staying on course, looking his critics in the eye, coming up with clear solutions against staying the course," Michelle Obama told Robin Roberts in an exclusive morning television interview on "Good Morning America." "That's what leadership is. But people have the right to criticize the President of the United States."Let me finish that last thought for you, Michelle. I see you rubbing your hands together and thinking, "Yes, for now people have the right to criticize him, but we're working on changing that."
Views: 32 Comments: 0
In his letter, being sent out to Arpaio supporters today as part of a 100,000-person national direct mail drop, the sheriff calls Hayworth's decision to challenge McCain "courageous." And he pledges to help Hayworth "every step of the way." "Senator McCain has served this country admirably but it's time to replace his moderate or even liberal positions on taxes, the border, social causes and big bank bailouts with a consistent conservative like J.D.," Arpaio continues. "After years of running over Republican principles his entire career no election year conversion to our way of thinking will save his campaign from voters that want conservatives to be a part of the solution rather than part of the problem," he says.
Views: 46 Comments: 0
McCain now finds himself jammed, moving starkly — and often awkwardly — to the right, apparently in an effort to gain favor among the same voters whom Mr. Hayworth, a consistent voice for the far right, could pull toward him like taffy come summer. McCain now sharply criticizes the bailout bill he voted for, pivoted from his earlier position that the Guantánamo Bay detention facility should be closed, offered only a muted response to the Supreme Court’s decision undoing campaign finance laws and backed down from statements that gays in the military would be O.K. by him... “John is undergoing a campaign conversion,” Mr. Hayworth said. Hayworth’s radio-personality bluster and big emotions.. may now have a part in the greater populist narrative that threatens many of the nation’s more centrist Republicans.
Views: 31 Comments: 0
Iran said Tuesday that it had begun producing higher-grade enriched uranium, marking a new and potentially dangerous turn in Tehran's confrontation with the West over its nuclear ambitions... U.S. National Intelligence Director Dennis C. Blair told the House intelligence committee last week that "Iran has the scientific, the technical, the industrial capacity to produce enough highly enriched uranium for a weapon in the next few years and eventually to produce a nuclear weapon. The central issue is a political decision by Iran to do so."
Views: 31 Comments: 0
I wouldn't want my fingerprints on anything this administration or congress proposes. Reid told reporters the bill would be introduced on Tuesday, and that it would include an extension of the tax breaks... Reid did not say how expensive the jobs bill would be. The Senate had been considering a package of roughly $80 billion. The House passed a larger jobs bill before Christmas, but now plans to unveil a different bill independent of that package, which did not garner Republican support.
Views: 58 Comments: 0
Back in November, the House passed its health care bill by a narrow 220 to 215 margin, with 39 Democrats voting against it. Since then, the one Republican who voted for it — Joseph Cao — has indicated that he would not support the bill a second time around given the weaker language on abortion in the Senate version. In addition, Florida Rep. Robert Wexler already retired prematurely. Factor in Murtha’s death today, and Pelosi is down to 217 votes — one short of passage. To pass the bill at some point in the next few months, she’ll need to flip a Democrat who is already on record voting against the bill.
Views: 124 Comments: 1
Don't think that Republicans can't be sucked in when an anti-Wall Street lynch mob gets its blood up. Recall that Sarbanes-Oxley, the devastating antigrowth response in 2002 to the Enron and Worldcom scandals, was passed with virtually unanimous support by Republicans in Congress, and signed by a Republican president. Recall that last year 85 House Republicans voted for a 90% tax on bonuses for any employee of any bank that took more than $5 billion in TARP money. Investors got some good news last Friday. Stocks resisted following through on Thursday's sharp plunge after (Congress) reached an impasse on bank re-regulation. That's a nice down payment on what investors need a lot more of now: proof that the GOP won't join Democrats in a populist rush to seek revenge against Wall Street.
Views: 78 Comments: 3
Just two years after Mr. Obama helped his party pull in record Wall Street contributions — $89 million from the securities and investment business, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics — some of his biggest supporters, like Mr. Dimon, have become the industry’s chief lobbyists against his regulatory agenda. Republicans are rushing to capitalize on what they call Wall Street’s “buyer’s remorse” with the Democrats. And industry executives and lobbyists are warning Democrats that if Mr. Obama keeps attacking Wall Street “fat cats,” they may fight back by withholding their cash.
Views: 78 Comments: 2
The Dow, down almost 104 points, had its 10th triple-digit move in 16 trading days. Shares of big banks pulled the market lower, extending a slump that has led to four straight weekly losses.I can't, for the life of me, understand why bank stocks would be dropping. Inexplicable.
Views: 57 Comments: 2
Bill, I am so glad that people are picking up on this detail. The administration and Dems in Congress are yelling and screaming about AIG because they want us to mad at "those evil businessmen," not at the politicians who crafted this mess.