
by: Bill Dupray posted: 2009-10-28 11:58:00
Viewed 325 times. 1 Comments.

Full disclosure up front. We at Patriot Room endorsed Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman in the NY-23 special election next week. We led off last week's podcast (link now fixed) with the endorsement and a discussion of the race.
But even if we were not supporting him, it is still mind boggling why the national Republican Party, and the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) in particular, cannot seem to acknowledge that their candidate, Dede Scozzafava is (1) tanking in the polls and cannot win and (2) is taking votes from Hoffman, who, if he got her votes, would most definitely beat the Democrat, Bill Owens.
As pointed out by Bill Pascoe at CQ Politics, why the hell does it matter to the National Republicans which Republican wins, as long as one of them does?
That's the truly remarkable part of this whole story -- look at all the polls taken in this race, and you see that if you combine the Scozzafava vote and the Hoffman vote, you've got a clear majority for one Republican candidate; why should it make a difference to the NRCC whether the Republican who represents the district is the officially-sanctioned (but very liberal) Republican, or the unofficially-sanctioned (but more mainstream conservative) Republican?Answer: It should not. Either one is going to vote for a Republican for Speaker, and that's all the NRCC cares about -- scratch that, should care about -- in this instance.
The other maddening issue, especially for a group that purports to represent the entire right side of the political spectrum like the NRCC, is they don't seem to understand who their true base is.
Apparently, [Oklahoma Republican Congressman Tom] Cole is the first Republican insider to recognize the importance of the confluence of two key data points revealed in recent polling -- last week's Washington Post/ABC News poll, which revealed that only 20 percent of the nation answers to the name "Republican," posted against this week's Gallup Poll, which showed that 40 percent of the country identifies itself as "conservative."In other words, Cole understands which end is the tail, and which end is the dog.
Note to Republican leaders -- when there are twice as many people calling themselves "conservative" as there are people calling themselves "Republican," it makes no sense to nominate as your party's candidate a woman who's so far to the left, ideologically, that she's been endorsed by the nation's premier left-wing blogger.
The MSM lefties love the "fight on the right" meme in NY-23 and will use it to talk about the "crack-up" of the Republican Party (one of their favorite story lines and a term, funnily enough, that never seems to apply to the Democrats' intramural fights, despite the fact that such fights are the sole reason no health care and energy reforms have been enacted).
But I would expect the NRCC, which is presumably interested in electing any Republican that can win wouldn't try to be the cause of the fight-on-the-right. These things are not static. The Conservative candidate, Doug Hoffman, now has the momentum and both parties agree that Scozzafava is toast. There is a week left and Hoffman can win. It is time for somebody to tell Michael Steele, the NRCC, and the RNC that they need to back off and let Hoffman win this seat. Otherwise, they will be the ones to blame for the loss.
Tags: Scozzafava, NRCC,
Trackback url: http://patriotroom.com/article/the-republican-party-s-breathtaking-cluelessness-in-ny-23-election/trackback
According to these rulings, such health legislation creates a statutory requirement for abortion funding, unless Congress clearly forbids such funding. That is why the Hyde amendment was needed in 1976, to stop Medicaid from funding 300,000 abortions a year. The statutory mandate construed by the courts would override any executive order or regulation. This is the unanimous view of our legal advisors and of the experts we have consulted on abortion jurisprudence. Only a change in the law enacted by Congress, not an executive order, can begin to address this very serious problem in the legislation."
Views: 69 Comments: 0
Views: 86 Comments: 0
[Democrats] have inserted . . . a provision that it would take a supermajority of 67 votes in the Senate for future legislative bodies to even consider amendments to its provisions for "death panels." . . . The bill states, "It shall not be in order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment, or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection." That subsection addresses rules and regulations that doctors would be ordered to follow by the "Independent Medicare Advisory Boards a/k/a the Death Panels," RedState reported.
Views: 72 Comments: 1
The original version of legislation in the House had specifically exempted TRICARE from being affected. However, when the final bill language was released on Thursday afternoon, it was revealed that neither the Senate bill nor the reconciliation package contained an exemption for TRICARE. “Our military families need to be able to count on their health care benefits, and I am not willing to risk negative consequences for our military personnel and their families, particularly at a time when our troops are serving overseas in harm’s way,” said Nye.
Views: 58 Comments: 0
Views: 45 Comments: 3
The problem is the sequence. Can the House vote to amend something that isn't the law, as the Senate bill will not be law before the president's signature? The Rules Committee meeting turned into mass confusion when Democratic Rep. Henry Waxman said, "We're not going to 'deem' the bill passed. We're going to pass the Senate bill…I would be against the idea of 'deeming' something -- we either pass it or we don't."
Views: 96 Comments: 4
Views: 112 Comments: 0
Views: 200 Comments: 0
Views: 105 Comments: 1
Views: 176 Comments: 0
I will not tell anybody that I'm a Republican ever again. They lost me when not one of the spineless idiots would demand to see proof of the magic negro's constitutional eligibility. With tinfoil hat still firmly in place I believe now more than ever that had anyone had the balls to make this man prove his eligibility before the election then we would not find ourselves in this situation.
Michael Steele is a joke as is the entire Republican machine. Didn't Newt also endorse this woman? There's something in the punch bowl that doesn't belong there.
Thanks for the great post, Bill.