x

Please Login




Register Here!

On Politics, We Can Always See the Whites of Their Eyes.

 Search:  
Login / Register   About Us   Advertise   Contact Us  
RSS Feed

The Patriot Room

The Republican Party's breathtaking cluelessness in NY-23 election

by: Bill Dupray   posted: 2009-10-28 11:58:00
Viewed 325 times. 1 Comments.

Photo credit/The Busy Brain

Full disclosure up front. We at Patriot Room endorsed Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman in the NY-23 special election next week. We led off last week's podcast (link now fixed) with the endorsement and a discussion of the race.

But even if we were not supporting him, it is still mind boggling why the national Republican Party, and the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) in particular, cannot seem to acknowledge that their candidate, Dede Scozzafava is (1) tanking in the polls and cannot win and (2) is taking votes from Hoffman, who, if he got her votes, would most definitely beat the Democrat, Bill Owens.

As pointed out by Bill Pascoe at CQ Politics, why the hell does it matter to the National Republicans which Republican wins, as long as one of them does?

That's the truly remarkable part of this whole story -- look at all the polls taken in this race, and you see that if you combine the Scozzafava vote and the Hoffman vote, you've got a clear majority for one Republican candidate; why should it make a difference to the NRCC whether the Republican who represents the district is the officially-sanctioned (but very liberal) Republican, or the unofficially-sanctioned (but more mainstream conservative) Republican?

Answer: It should not. Either one is going to vote for a Republican for Speaker, and that's all the NRCC cares about -- scratch that, should care about -- in this instance.

The other maddening issue, especially for a group that purports to represent the entire right side of the political spectrum like the NRCC, is they don't seem to understand who their true base is.

Apparently, [Oklahoma Republican Congressman Tom] Cole is the first Republican insider to recognize the importance of the confluence of two key data points revealed in recent polling -- last week's Washington Post/ABC News poll, which revealed that only 20 percent of the nation answers to the name "Republican," posted against this week's Gallup Poll, which showed that 40 percent of the country identifies itself as "conservative."

In other words, Cole understands which end is the tail, and which end is the dog.

Note to Republican leaders -- when there are twice as many people calling themselves "conservative" as there are people calling themselves "Republican," it makes no sense to nominate as your party's candidate a woman who's so far to the left, ideologically, that she's been endorsed by the nation's premier left-wing blogger.

The MSM lefties love the "fight on the right" meme in NY-23 and will use it to talk about the "crack-up" of the Republican Party (one of their favorite story lines and a term, funnily enough, that never seems to apply to the Democrats' intramural fights, despite the fact that such fights are the sole reason no health care and energy reforms have been enacted).

But I would expect the NRCC, which is presumably interested in electing any Republican that can win wouldn't try to be the cause of the fight-on-the-right. These things are not static. The Conservative candidate, Doug Hoffman, now has the momentum and both parties agree that Scozzafava is toast. There is a week left and Hoffman can win. It is time for somebody to tell Michael Steele, the NRCC, and the RNC that they need to back off and let Hoffman win this seat. Otherwise, they will be the ones to blame for the loss.

Tags:

Related Articles


Links to this post

Trackback url: http://patriotroom.com/article/the-republican-party-s-breathtaking-cluelessness-in-ny-23-election/trackback

Comments 1

MSGT's Daughter on 2009-10-28 13:21:00

I will not tell anybody that I'm a Republican ever again. They lost me when not one of the spineless idiots would demand to see proof of the magic negro's constitutional eligibility. With tinfoil hat still firmly in place I believe now more than ever that had anyone had the balls to make this man prove his eligibility before the election then we would not find ourselves in this situation.

Michael Steele is a joke as is the entire Republican machine. Didn't Newt also endorse this woman? There's something in the punch bowl that doesn't belong there.

Thanks for the great post, Bill.


Have an opinion?

 Name (required)
 Email (required)
 Website

If you were a member you wouldn't have to input that stuff!


What is 2 + 3 ? (seriously... for moderates the answer is 4 and for liberals the answer is cat)

Note: Your comment may be held for moderation.

blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you

Publius' Newsstand

  • Conference of Bishops: It is the unanimous view...

    Do we really need to state the obvious? Laws are made and changed in the Legislative Branch, not the Executive. Only in dictatorships are laws made by the Executive Branch.
    According to these rulings, such health legislation creates a statutory requirement for abortion funding, unless Congress clearly forbids such funding. That is why the Hyde amendment was needed in 1976, to stop Medicaid from funding 300,000 abortions a year. The statutory mandate construed by the courts would override any executive order or regulation. This is the unanimous view of our legal advisors and of the experts we have consulted on abortion jurisprudence. Only a change in the law enacted by Congress, not an executive order, can begin to address this very serious problem in the legislation."

      Views: 69 Comments: 0

  • Breaking: Hoyer - We don't have the votes yet

    House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) predicted Sunday that Democrats will have the votes to pass the massive health care bill later in the day, but he suggested a number of crucial Members were still undecided. “There are still Members looking at it and trying to make up their minds, but we think there are going to be 216-plus votes when we call the roll,” Hoyer said on NBC’s "Meet the Press.” He added, "We’re going to pass this bill.” Hoyer said the remaining votes the Democrats need are “in the low single digits, certainly.”

      Views: 86 Comments: 0

  • Senate bill requires 67 vote supermajority to k...

    So the Dems now want to decide who lives and who dies so badly, they have rigged the rules to require 67 votes to kill the death panels. Keep in mind this is the same number of votes needed to pass a Constitutional Amendment.
    [Democrats] have inserted . . . a provision that it would take a supermajority of 67 votes in the Senate for future legislative bodies to even consider amendments to its provisions for "death panels." . . . The bill states, "It shall not be in order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment, or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection." That subsection addresses rules and regulations that doctors would be ordered to follow by the "Independent Medicare Advisory Boards a/k/a the Death Panels," RedState reported.

      Views: 72 Comments: 1

  • Dems trash Tricare, start losing votes: Nye is ...

    Remember, these are the people who bristle when you say they do not support the troops and question their patriotism. Democrat Glen Nye (Va) says he's not that kind of Democrat.
    The original version of legislation in the House had specifically exempted TRICARE from being affected. However, when the final bill language was released on Thursday afternoon, it was revealed that neither the Senate bill nor the reconciliation package contained an exemption for TRICARE. “Our military families need to be able to count on their health care benefits, and I am not willing to risk negative consequences for our military personnel and their families, particularly at a time when our troops are serving overseas in harm’s way,” said Nye.

      Views: 58 Comments: 0

  • Stupak this morning: Until we have a deal on ab...

    The possible deal would focus on an executive order that would specify there would be no public funding for abortions in the healthcare bill. "We're close but we're not there yet," Stupak said. Democratic leaders said Sunday they have the votes on healthcare reform, but Stupak said until there is a deal struck, they don't have the 216 votes they need. Stupak said "there were eight of us" in the negotiating room, all of them no votes.

      Views: 45 Comments: 3

  • Waxman: No 'Deem and Pass' - We pass the Senate...

    Hmmm. If Demon Pass is dead (and it is dead according to multiple sources), then they either have the votes and we are just waiting for it, or they would rather lose on an up or down vote so as to avoid the appearance of being Enemies of the State. Since the meeting broke down into chaos, one wonders if they actually have the votes.
    The problem is the sequence. Can the House vote to amend something that isn't the law, as the Senate bill will not be law before the president's signature? The Rules Committee meeting turned into mass confusion when Democratic Rep. Henry Waxman said, "We're not going to 'deem' the bill passed. We're going to pass the Senate bill…I would be against the idea of 'deeming' something -- we either pass it or we don't."

      Views: 96 Comments: 4

  • Rep. Altmire confirms: NO

    Nancy has about run out of "yes" votes: Congressman Jason Altmire will vote against the latest version of health care reform when the U.S. House of Representatives votes on the bill this weekend. Altmire confirmed that he has decided to vote no in a telephone conversation with KDKA Political Editor Jon Delano. The McCandless Democrat is expected to post a statement on his website later today.

      Views: 112 Comments: 0

  • JIP: Obama Approval Under Disapproval on RCP

    Tough to be Barry: Real Clear Politics, or RCP for short, is a news site that averages approval/disapproval polls together, forming a very non-partisan system. For the last year and change, I have closely watched the approval of the President. Slowly but surely, it kept going lower and lower and lower. The President was at his peak on January 29, 2009 with an approval of 63.5 and a disapproval of only 19.3, a 44.2% difference. From the beginning of March to the end of June, Obama's approval/disapproval held moderately steady. But then it happened. The President began calling for radical reforms to the American Health Care System. While reform is needed, this "change" that the President was peddling did not sit well with the American people.

      Views: 200 Comments: 0

  • Will House recon bill surive intact in Senate? ...

    Very clear. Toast: FTA: Senate Budget Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) said Thursday that it is unlikely the Senate will be able to pass a health care reconciliation bill unchanged from what the House passes. Conrad said the Senate Parliamentarian has declined to make rulings on several issues in the bill that Republicans are likely to challenge under the “Byrd rule.” That rule states that, among other things, every provision of a budget reconciliation bill must have a budget impact and cannot be “extraneous.” “Although we’ve spent many, many hours with the Parliamentarian, some things he has not yet rendered a conclusion” on, Conrad said. “He wants to hear from both sides before he does.” Conrad continued: “Do I expect there will be some additional Byrd rule challenges that will be upheld? Yeah. I do.”

      Views: 105 Comments: 1

  • Another flip from Yes to No: Rep. Michael Arcur...

    Rep. Mike Arcuri (D., N.Y.), a sophomore who had a tough go of it in 2008, will vote nay on Obamacare, both on the House floor and in the Rules Committee. The Rules vote is symbolic, since Democrats outnumber Republicans there two-to-one. But the floor vote could go either way. It is obviously a blow to Pelosi's chances of hitting 216.

      Views: 176 Comments: 0

Get Your PR Button!

Copyright © 2008-2009 Patriot Room Media, LLC
Privacy Policy  Terms Of Service