On Politics, We Can Always See the Whites of Their Eyes.
Uh Oh: Even Liberals Think Sotomayor Too Dumb for Supreme Court
by: Bill Dupray posted: 2009-05-26 13:26:00
Viewed 1189 times. 16 Comments.
Forget ideology for a minute. It doesn't matter on which side of the political aisle you stand. Everyone should seek and hope for the brightest minds possible for the Supreme Court. Earlier this month, Jeffrey Rosen at the liberal New Republic, was profiling potential SCOTUS nominees and did a little write up on Judge Sotomayor that was well, less than charitable. In fact it probably falls more into the category of hit-piece and a warning to the administration to avoid this judge.
This is a lefty writer, at a lefty rag, interviewing lots of lefties who know Sotomayor, and who really want a lefty Justice on the High Court. And they think she is too dumb.
But despite the praise from some of her former clerks, and warm words from some of her Second Circuit colleagues, there are also many reservations about Sotomayor. Over the past few weeks, I've been talking to a range of people who have worked with her, nearly all of them former law clerks for other judges on the Second Circuit or former federal prosecutors in New York. Most are Democrats and all of them want President Obama to appoint a judicial star of the highest intellectual caliber who has the potential to change the direction of the court. Nearly all of them acknowledged that Sotomayor is a presumptive front-runner, but nearly none of them raved about her. They expressed questions about her temperament, her judicial craftsmanship, and most of all, her ability to provide an intellectual counterweight to the conservative justices, as well as a clear liberal alternative.The most consistent concern was that Sotomayor, although an able lawyer, was "not that smart and kind of a bully on the bench," as one former Second Circuit clerk for another judge put it. "She has an inflated opinion of herself, and is domineering during oral arguments, but her questions aren't penetrating and don't get to the heart of the issue." (During one argument, an elderly judicial colleague is said to have leaned over and said, "Will you please stop talking and let them talk?"). . . .
Her opinions, although competent, are viewed by former prosecutors as not especially clean or tight, and sometimes miss the forest for the trees. . . .
Some former clerks and prosecutors expressed concerns about her command of technical legal details: In 2001, for example, a conservative colleague, Ralph Winter, included an unusual footnote in a case suggesting that an earlier opinion by Sotomayor might have inadvertently misstated the law in a way that misled litigants.
And the knockout punch. Keep in mind no partisan Republicans took part in this thrashing.
It's possible that the former clerks and former prosecutors I talked to have an incomplete picture of her abilities. But they're not motivated by sour grapes or by ideological disagreement--they'd like the most intellectually powerful and politically effective liberal justice possible. And they think that Sotomayor, although personally and professionally impressive, may not meet that demanding standard. Given the stakes, the president should obviously satisfy himself that he has a complete picture before taking a gamble.
And the dumbing-down of the Supreme Court (thank you Affirmative Action) begins. Everybody said David Souter was odd, quirky, and boring. But nobody ever said he was an idiot.
Related Articles
- Contest: Win a pre-release copy of John Yoo's 'Crisis and Command' in time for Christmas delivery!
- Dems Said The Class Act “Ponzi Scheme” Strip It, But It Is Included In Final Health Care Bill
- Novel idea: It is Time for Republican Leaders to Step Down - on Principle
- Excellent one-click tweet and contact page for important Senators - Please RT
Links to this post
Trackback url: http://patriotroom.com/article/uh-oh-even-liberals-think-sotomayor-too-dumb-for-supreme-court/trackback
Comments 16
And liberal haters at that. Just amazing. I'm ... I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you!
I am with Jim Smith and Clyde. Who knew that liberals were so elitist and condescending? I am sure she got into those great schools solely on the merits of her intellectual firepower.
I may be wrong, but I don't think Yale Law gives honor categories. I know it doesn't give grades, so I would suspect that designating any of its graduates with honors would be very difficult.
Not to mention unfair to all the non-winners (we avoid using the term "losers." It affects self-esteem).
I love people who think degrees and awards granted by leftist institutions and leftist professors have any relation to intelligence. Silly, silly people.
You're so right, Scott.
I didn't even graduate high school. Would you have known that by my comments here if I hadn't told you?
Of course, some people think I'm as dumb as a rock. Usually it's those who have degrees from "leftist institutions." Those are insane asylums, aren't they? :-)
Book learning pales compared to life experience. Never let a piece of paper on the wall define someone's worth or intelligence in comparison to yourself.
Don't be so quick on Souter. I don't think history will ever look on him as an intellectual heavyweight.
I think Sotomayor is the natural choice for Souter's legacy. Just as Bush 41 needed to nominate a black man for Thurgood Marshall's seat, and Bush 43 wanted a woman for O'Connor's seat, I think that Sotomayor is filling the idiot seat.
Now if we could only take that seat and place it in the corner of the courtroom, it would be more appropriate.
Is she a woman? Man, she sure is UGLY!
It's a well-known fact that conservative women are much hotter than liberal women.
Yeah, like that MAN in woman's clothing, Ann Coulter.
First, why do people nowadays get labeled a 'hater' if they have an opinion that differs? Is it the new label that gets thrown around in place of (or along side of) 'racist' ? Labeling someone a 'hater' is not a coherent argument for or against something!
Second, Are you blind Jason? Ann Coulter is smokin' HOT!!
"Ann Coulter is smokin' HOT!!"
Because she is the devil....:)
Have an opinion?
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
Publius' Newsstand
-
Waxman: No 'Deem and Pass' - We pass the Senate...
Hmmm. If Demon Pass is dead (and it is dead according to multiple sources), then they either have the votes and we are just waiting for it, or they would rather lose on an up or down vote so as to avoid the appearance of being Enemies of the State. Since the meeting broke down into chaos, one wonders if they actually have the votes.The problem is the sequence. Can the House vote to amend something that isn't the law, as the Senate bill will not be law before the president's signature? The Rules Committee meeting turned into mass confusion when Democratic Rep. Henry Waxman said, "We're not going to 'deem' the bill passed. We're going to pass the Senate bill…I would be against the idea of 'deeming' something -- we either pass it or we don't."
Views: 77 Comments: 3
-
Rep. Altmire confirms: NO
Nancy has about run out of "yes" votes: Congressman Jason Altmire will vote against the latest version of health care reform when the U.S. House of Representatives votes on the bill this weekend. Altmire confirmed that he has decided to vote no in a telephone conversation with KDKA Political Editor Jon Delano. The McCandless Democrat is expected to post a statement on his website later today.Views: 108 Comments: 0
-
JIP: Obama Approval Under Disapproval on RCP
Tough to be Barry: Real Clear Politics, or RCP for short, is a news site that averages approval/disapproval polls together, forming a very non-partisan system. For the last year and change, I have closely watched the approval of the President. Slowly but surely, it kept going lower and lower and lower. The President was at his peak on January 29, 2009 with an approval of 63.5 and a disapproval of only 19.3, a 44.2% difference. From the beginning of March to the end of June, Obama's approval/disapproval held moderately steady. But then it happened. The President began calling for radical reforms to the American Health Care System. While reform is needed, this "change" that the President was peddling did not sit well with the American people.Views: 196 Comments: 0
-
Will House recon bill surive intact in Senate? ...
Very clear. Toast: FTA: Senate Budget Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) said Thursday that it is unlikely the Senate will be able to pass a health care reconciliation bill unchanged from what the House passes. Conrad said the Senate Parliamentarian has declined to make rulings on several issues in the bill that Republicans are likely to challenge under the “Byrd rule.” That rule states that, among other things, every provision of a budget reconciliation bill must have a budget impact and cannot be “extraneous.” “Although we’ve spent many, many hours with the Parliamentarian, some things he has not yet rendered a conclusion” on, Conrad said. “He wants to hear from both sides before he does.” Conrad continued: “Do I expect there will be some additional Byrd rule challenges that will be upheld? Yeah. I do.”Views: 104 Comments: 1
-
Another flip from Yes to No: Rep. Michael Arcur...
Rep. Mike Arcuri (D., N.Y.), a sophomore who had a tough go of it in 2008, will vote nay on Obamacare, both on the House floor and in the Rules Committee. The Rules vote is symbolic, since Democrats outnumber Republicans there two-to-one. But the floor vote could go either way. It is obviously a blow to Pelosi's chances of hitting 216.Views: 169 Comments: 0
-
Update on CBO: Corrupt Dem leaders touting unof...
Thanks to Avery for the heads-up on today's atrocity rolling off Capitol Hill.Ranking Republican Paul Ryan responds to an NRO query about the news this morning: “The Congressional Budget Office has confirmed that there is currently no official cost estimate. Yet House Democrats are touting to the press — and spinning for partisan gain — numbers that have not been released and are impossible to confirm.
Boy, a final official number that came in over a trillion bucks would really bite them in the a**.Views: 135 Comments: 1
-
McCain's lead over Hayworth shrinks to 7
Johnny Mac is also under the all-important 50% support level.The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of likely Arizona GOP Primary voters shows McCain ahead 48% to 41%. Three percent (3%) favor another candidate, and eight percent (8%) are undecided. Following the announcement that Sarah Palin would campaign for his reelection, McCain opened up a 53% to 31% lead over Hayworth in January. The two men were in a near tie in November.
By my math, McCain's lead shrunk from 21 to 7 in two months. Hmmm.Views: 80 Comments: 0
-
CBO: Obamacare costs $940 billion
And in the world of Washington speak, somehow spending that much cash actually lowers the deficit by $130 billion. I have a better idea. How about we just not spend $940 billion in the first place? After all, if you are trying to trim your budget, you don't go buying a Lamborghini on a credit card. One more thing. Isn't it funny how CBO can score a bill without an actual bill. Hmmm . . .Views: 91 Comments: 0
-
USA Today editors: The Slaughter Rule is a 'gim...
Keep in mind USA Today wholeheartedly supports this health care takeover, but even they are disturbed by "deeming" a bill passed without a vote in the House.[House] leaders are mulling a rule that would allow the chamber to "deem" the Senate's version of health legislation as passed, without actually having to vote on it. Imagine how useful this trick would be in daily life. You could make unpopular decisions without actually appearing to make them. That excruciating Thanksgiving dinner at your brother-in-law's? You "deemed" that you attended. . . . It's understandable that some House Democrats wouldn't want to cast a direct vote on the Senate bill . . . before moving to change it. But a procedure this transparently gimmicky just adds to the cynicism surrounding the bill and opens it up to unnecessary court challenges.
Views: 97 Comments: 2
-
Biden bombs at Correspondents' Dinner
Biden is funnier when he isn't trying to be funny. This stuff is so lame, he should have gotten the hook. More, if you can stand them, at the link. - "I just got back from five days in the Middle East. It's great to be back to a place where a boom in housing construction is a good thing." - "Liz Cheney is here tonight. Liz has been on a tear. Now she's questioning if Tom Brady is a Patriot." Meh, said the crowd. "What the hell, it was worth a try." - On moving to Washington: "I voted for public housing all my career -- never realized how good it actually is!"Views: 112 Comments: 1
Get Your PR Button!
More Articles By Bill Dupray
- How Obamacare dies: NOT buying health insurance is NOT Interstate Commerce
on 2010-03-20 with 309 views - Waxman: No 'Deem and Pass' - We pass the Senate bill or we don't
on 2010-03-20 with 77 views - Another flip from Yes to No: Rep. Michael Arcuri (D-NY)
on 2010-03-18 with 169 views - CBO: Actually, those defict reduction figures are pretty much guesses
on 2010-03-18 with 146 views - Update on CBO: Corrupt Dem leaders touting unofficial numbers
on 2010-03-18 with 135 views - Homeowner introduces two robbers to 2nd Amendment: One dead, one fled
on 2010-03-18 with 298 views - McCain's lead over Hayworth shrinks to 7
on 2010-03-18 with 80 views - CBO: Obamacare costs $940 billion
on 2010-03-18 with 91 views - USA Today editors: The Slaughter Rule is a 'gimmicky, cynical trick'
on 2010-03-18 with 97 views - Biden bombs at Correspondents' Dinner
on 2010-03-18 with 112 views
Too dumb, eh? She graduated summa cum laude from Yale, high honors from Princeton, and was the editor of the Yale law review.
Sounds like haters to me.