x

Please Login




Register Here!

On Politics, We Can Always See the Whites of Their Eyes.

 Search:  
Login / Register   About Us   Advertise   Contact Us  
RSS Feed

The Patriot Room

W on 2005 Iranian election

by: Clyde Middleton   posted: 2009-06-21 23:33:00
Viewed 490 times. 6 Comments.

As I've read some comments here and around the web two themes have troubled me: Praising Obama for his "strong stance" on the current situation, and condemnation of Bush for his "antics" as president.

I usually bite my tongue, instead allowing folks to dig their own holes. Researching another topic, however, I came across a 2005 article concerning comments on the then-upcoming Iranian presidential election that I believe are valid to read in light of the current situation - both to the events on the ground in Iran and President Obama's reaction to them.

In our podcast immediately prior to the election, we discussed the candidates on the ballot, pointing out that several folks had applied to be candidates but were refused by the Guardian Council. Note that President Obama has said nothing on this topic. In 2005, President Bush said:

President Bush yesterday denounced Tehran's theocracy for manipulating the vote by eliminating candidates and ignoring the "basic requirements" of democracy. Whatever the election's outcome, power will continue to be held by "an unelected few" who are out of step with political changes sweeping the rest of the region, Bush said in a statement released by the White House.

Does Iran have a democracy? President Obama said this in Cairo (about democracy - not about Iran):

I know there has been controversy about the promotion of democracy in recent years, and much of this controversy is connected to the war in Iraq. So let me be clear: no system of government can or should be imposed upon one nation by any other.

...

There is no straight line to realize this promise. But this much is clear: governments that protect these rights are ultimately more stable, successful and secure. Suppressing ideas never succeeds in making them go away. America respects the right of all peaceful and law-abiding voices to be heard around the world, even if we disagree with them. And we will welcome all elected, peaceful governments - provided they govern with respect for all their people.

This last point is important because there are some who advocate for democracy only when they are out of power; once in power, they are ruthless in suppressing the rights of others. No matter where it takes hold, government of the people and by the people sets a single standard for all who hold power: you must maintain your power through consent, not coercion; you must respect the rights of minorities, and participate with a spirit of tolerance and compromise; you must place the interests of your people and the legitimate workings of the political process above your party. Without these ingredients, elections alone do not make true democracy.

How nuanced. How "well this, but then that." How unclear.

Preident Bush said this in 2005:

"Today, Iran is ruled by men who suppress liberty at home and spread terror across the world," Bush said. "Power is in the hands of an unelected few who have retained power through an electoral process that ignores the basic requirements of democracy. The June 17th presidential elections are sadly consistent with this oppressive record."

Concerning the Iranian people and their search for freedom, Obama said this:

This page left intentionally blank.

President Bush said this:

Addressing the Iranian people, Bush added: "As you stand for your own liberty, the people of America stand with you."

"Across the Middle East, hopeful change is taking place. People are claiming their liberty. And as a tide of freedom sweeps this region, it will also come eventually to Iran," Bush predicted.

To those folks that praise Obama and condemn Bush, the message is clear: Get your facts straight or shut up.

Have a nice day.

Tags:

Related Articles


Links to this post

Trackback url: http://patriotroom.com/article/w-on-2005-iranian-election/trackback


Comments 6

American Genie on 2009-06-22 00:08:06

"To those folks that praise Obama and condemn Bush, the message is clear: Get your facts straight or shut up."

Gee, Clyde, you shouldn't sugar coat it so much!

Did I ever tell you that I like your style?

God bless America!


Clyde on 2009-06-22 00:09:10

Smile. Sometimes somethings just have to be said.


Robert on 2009-06-22 02:27:37

Obama's silence seems to come when the voice of a leader is most needed. Is it any surprise that Iran and North Korea are showing their collective a**es to us recently. They understand that this administration is weak and lacks the resolve to stand up for our principles. For some maniacal reason Obama seems to think all of the worlds ills will be solved through diplomacy. Unfortunately no one told Iran or N. Korea. His limp wristed approach is likely to get us bombed back to the stone age. I really hope the next four years pass without incident. I am just not so optimistic anymore.


Jay Wallingford on 2009-06-22 06:38:21

"To those folks that praise Obama and condemn Bush, the message is clear: Get your facts straight or shut up."

So, what are the facts about what President Bush's words in 2005 actually achieved? Boy, that speech really helped stop the swing to Amadinejad...not!

Just sayin'...


Clyde on 2009-06-22 08:56:17

On second thought, Jay, what did it accomplish? Precisely what you see on the streets in Iran today. President Bush told the citizens it was freedom to go after - and now they are.

Precisely in the same manner President Reagan told the people under USSR control that it was OK. "Tear down this wall." Remember? Oh, yeah, you wouldn't because the wall actually came down under George the Elder.

Just sayin'


Clyde on 2009-06-22 08:37:27

It's called leadership, Jay. It's called addressing a situation by calling it for what it is, Jay. It's called not allowing a power or moral vacuum to be created, Jay. It's called being a man, Jay.

I don't know you, but I absolutely guaranty that you have never dealt with a true adversary in other than a curled up position.

Just sayin'


Have an opinion?

 Name (required)
 Email (required)
 Website

If you were a member you wouldn't have to input that stuff!


What is 2 + 3 ? (seriously... for moderates the answer is 4 and for liberals the answer is cat)

Note: Your comment may be held for moderation.

blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you

Publius' Newsstand

  • Without Murtha, Dems now one vote short of pass...

    Didn't realize the implication's of Murtha's passing today, which include the following...
    Back in November, the House passed its health care bill by a narrow 220 to 215 margin, with 39 Democrats voting against it. Since then, the one Republican who voted for it — Joseph Cao — has indicated that he would not support the bill a second time around given the weaker language on abortion in the Senate version. In addition, Florida Rep. Robert Wexler already retired prematurely. Factor in Murtha’s death today, and Pelosi is down to 217 votes — one short of passage. To pass the bill at some point in the next few months, she’ll need to flip a Democrat who is already on record voting against the bill.

      Views: 117 Comments: 0

  • Republicans and the Populist Temptation could T...

    A warning from my favorite economic analyst, Donald Luskin.
    Don't think that Republicans can't be sucked in when an anti-Wall Street lynch mob gets its blood up. Recall that Sarbanes-Oxley, the devastating antigrowth response in 2002 to the Enron and Worldcom scandals, was passed with virtually unanimous support by Republicans in Congress, and signed by a Republican president. Recall that last year 85 House Republicans voted for a 90% tax on bonuses for any employee of any bank that took more than $5 billion in TARP money. Investors got some good news last Friday. Stocks resisted following through on Thursday's sharp plunge after (Congress) reached an impasse on bank re-regulation. That's a nice down payment on what investors need a lot more of now: proof that the GOP won't join Democrats in a populist rush to seek revenge against Wall Street.

      Views: 77 Comments: 3

  • Message to Democrats: Wall St. Sends Cash to GO...

    Great news, but these guys were a little late in realizing that Obama wants to destroy all their corporations and confiscate their money. Not quite sure how they missed that.
    Just two years after Mr. Obama helped his party pull in record Wall Street contributions — $89 million from the securities and investment business, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics — some of his biggest supporters, like Mr. Dimon, have become the industry’s chief lobbyists against his regulatory agenda. Republicans are rushing to capitalize on what they call Wall Street’s “buyer’s remorse” with the Democrats. And industry executives and lobbyists are warning Democrats that if Mr. Obama keeps attacking Wall Street “fat cats,” they may fight back by withholding their cash.

      Views: 78 Comments: 2

  • Dow closes below 10,000 for first time in 3 mon...

    The Dow sinks below a major psychological threshold.
    The Dow, down almost 104 points, had its 10th triple-digit move in 16 trading days. Shares of big banks pulled the market lower, extending a slump that has led to four straight weekly losses.
    I can't, for the life of me, understand why bank stocks would be dropping. Inexplicable.

      Views: 57 Comments: 2

  • Poll: Special interests more influential under ...

    Voters are now categorically rejecting every claim or promise made by this guy.... including democrats:
    Contrary to President Obama's promises, voters say special interests have more influence on the political process now than they did a year ago, according to a new poll. The poll, paid for by groups looking to curb the Supreme Court's recent campaign finance ruling, found that majorities of both Republicans and Democrats say special interests have increased their influence since the president took office, and they say Mr. Obama has not done enough to fight back.

      Views: 59 Comments: 1

  • GOP leaders: Don't use current health bills for...

    Boehner and Cantor say the Pubs aren't going to be a part of any Presidential photo-op/dog-and-pony show:
    If the starting point for this meeting is the job-killing bills the American people have already soundly rejected, Republicans would rightly be reluctant to participate,” the pair explained in a letter to White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. They also said President Barack Obama should remove reconciliation from the table. Using budget reconciliation rules to move healthcare reform in the Senate would mean Democrats would only need 51 votes on procedural measures instead of 60... On Sunday afternoon however, Obama refused to say he would start from scratch.

      Views: 64 Comments: 2

  • Jack Murtha (D-PA) Dead at Age 77

    Sad news. Prayers and well wishes to his family and loved ones.
    An announcement from his office said Murtha died at 1:18 p.m. at the Virginia Hospital Center, where he had been admitted last week after having his gallbladder removed at Bethesda Naval Hospital.

      Views: 165 Comments: 6

  • I thought of killing myself, says climate scand...

    He doesn't need to go that far. But a lengthy jail sentence for the fraud-of-the-century would go a long way.
    The scientist at the centre of the “climategate” email scandal has revealed that he was so traumatised by the global backlash against him that he contemplated suicide. Jones, 57, said he was unprepared for the scandal: “I am just a scientist. I have no training in PR or dealing with crises.”
    Actually, he's using the term "scientist" loosely there, given that real scientists don't do what he did. And while he may not have any training dealing with crises, he sure was good at generating one: it was called the global warming crisis.

      Views: 146 Comments: 3

  • Yet again: China Renews Opposition to Iran Sanc...

    And for Obama's next act, he will, um, wait for it ... >> Reflecting a growing catalog of disputes between Washington and Beijing, a senior Chinese official said Thursday that pressure for tighter sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program could block chances of a diplomatic settlement on the issue. The official, Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi, was speaking in Paris less than a week after Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton rebuked China over its opposition to stronger measures against Tehran, saying Beijing’s position was shortsighted. <<

      Views: 112 Comments: 3

  • Franken feeling his oats: Rips into Axelrod ove...

    Smile. Gnawing on each others' legs: >> Five sources who were in the room tell POLITICO that Franken criticized Axelrod for the administration’s failure to provide clarity or direction on health care and the other big bills it wants Congress to enact. The sources said Franken was the most outspoken senator in the meeting, which followed President Barack Obama’s question-and-answer session with Senate Democrats at the Newseum on Wednesday. But they also said the Minnesotan wasn’t the only angry Democrat in the room. “There was a lot of frustration in there,” said a Democratic senator who declined to be identified. “People were hot,” another Democratic senator said. <<

      Views: 124 Comments: 3

Get Your PR Button!

Copyright © 2008-2009 Patriot Room Media, LLC
Privacy Policy  Terms Of Service