x

Please Login




Register Here!

On Politics, We Can Always See the Whites of Their Eyes.

 Search:  
Login / Register   About Us   Advertise   Contact Us  
RSS Feed

The Patriot Room

White House Admits Obama Energy Tax Will Increase Average Electric Bill By $1800 Per Year

by: Bill Dupray   posted: 2009-03-20 18:54:00
Viewed 5598 times. 16 Comments.

And that is lowballing it.

From Human Events.

President Obama’s energy tax plan -- a version of the failed European “cap and trade” global warming fiasco -- may cost families $1,800 yearly in higher utility bills, far exceeding his promised $800 a year tax cut for 95% of Americans.

While campaigning, Obama admitted that his energy plan would cause electric bills to “skyrocket.”

And lest you think this is partisan spin, the baseline figures are from Obama's own people.

Obama’s official budget claims that his proposed energy tax would add $646 billion to energy costs over 8 years. But that’s low-balling it.

As the Washington Times reported:

President Obama's climate plan could cost industry close to $2 trillion, nearly three times the White House's initial estimate of the so-called "cap-and-trade" legislation, according to Senate staffers who were briefed by the White House. . . . At the meeting, Jason Furman, a top Obama staffer, estimated that the president's cap-and-trade program could cost up to three times as much as the administration's early estimate of $646 billion over eight years.

Put another way, Furman estimates the cap-and-trade scheme will cost, on average, $250 billion annually. That estimate must be taken seriously because Furman is deputy director of Obama’s National Economic Council.

Obama says that these new taxes, which they do not dispute, will be partially offset by tax cuts of $800.00 for 95% of households (and yes, that is another phony use of "tax cut" which is actually a welfare check redistributed from taxpayers to the 42% of Americans who pay no taxes). And even then, everybody is still out at least $1,000.00 per year. All to pay for the hoax of Global Warming.

Is this what people who voted for Obama wanted?

Just curious.

Tags:

Related Articles


Links to this post

Trackback url: http://patriotroom.com/article/white-house-admits-obama-energy-tax-will-increase-average-electric-bill-by-1800-per-year/trackback


Comments 16

lorraine on 2009-03-21 10:47:34

I do not know how much more the American people will take before they decide that enough is enough and try to get this country out of the hands of the lunatics that are running Washington.

My business, which just 3 short years ago was almost making $300,000 gross, just this month alone I have barely made it to $6,000. Quite a drop. I have cut back on everything I can think of including advertising to try and weather this out and yet, I think the end result is that my business (which is my Sole Income) is fixing to be shut down.

I cannot afford Anymore taxes. I am taxed out.

I think that BO, Reid, Pelosi, Dodd, Frank and company need to have their faces put on wanted posters. They are criminal in their actions and are wrecking the Constitution


John Bowman on 2009-03-21 11:50:13

It is what a lot of people who voted for obama wanted: government intervention in the energy industry. I don't vote democrat, but I'm encouraged by the plan over the alternatives

What are the competing options? Drill our oil until its gone and then buy solar tech from the Chinese? Plow down the Rocky mountains and use all the water in the Colorado River Basin to process tar shale? Use all arable land in the US to produce 'biofuel' and import our food from overseas? The remaining brilliant plan is for ANWAR to give us 0.3% bbl/day over 20 years. yep, going to make a world of a difference, that one. It's also great that major cities have on average about 13day/yr where pollution makes exercise outside give lung damage. Yeah my children [and the republican ones I educate] are excited to inherit a country that has absolutely no future energy plan because I was unwilling to bear the costs of that future.

The 1800 dollar figure is specious. Perhaps people wasting that much energy deserve a lesson in their gluttony. For instance, that would represent a 320% tax rate on my current electricity bill (5people, 2300sq ft). This is another tax lie similar to the one you pushed about the doubling of payroll tax last month.


mark on 2009-03-23 02:51:37

This is not what people wanted when they voted for Obama. Most independents and all republicans who voted for Obama wanted to see fiscal responsibility. This is not that. It's crippling to our country's economy and disadventagous to American business.

This is government intervention that imposes a nonsensical tax to prevent global warming, something that for all intents and purposes is a scheme cooked up by quasi scientists to direct government money to themselves to study a nonexistent crisis. A scheme that will put the U.S. and other countries that adopt cap and trade at a disadvantage to those countries that rightly ignore the soothsayers. It has little to do with alternative energy or drilling in ANWAR.

Your statement denigrating people who will be burdened by the $1800.00 tax as being wasteful therefore deserving of having to pay the tax shows your true colors. You are not a republican nor are you proud of the exceptionalism of your country.


Rose2.0 on 2009-03-23 07:06:47

Well said, Mark -- and I'd add, the comments indicate possible addiction to the two commonly abused liberal drugs - the notion that one is better than, and also smarter than, anyone else.


Marc on 2009-04-16 13:11:15

OK, let me get this straight. You say that the $1800.00 figure is 320% of your energy bill for 5 people living in 2300 sqft.1800 is 320% of 562.5. Keep in mind that both of these figures are for a whole year. Are you seriously telling us that your energy bill is $562.50 a year, or just under $46.88 a month? Either you are living in a 2300 sqft cave or you never turn a light on.


MAS on 2009-03-21 12:49:22

This is the set of massive hidden tax increases that team Obama is going to dump on America.

Much of what Obama will be spending to pay off his political constituents in 2010 will be paid for through inflation. By printing money needed to meet these obligations, the Great One will be taxing everything - including food and heating fuel - by driving up all associated costs through inflation.

Cap and Trade, Universal Health Care and other proposals rely on the economically ignorant voting population that the teachers unions have provided. They will learn this when their heating bills go sky high and fuel supplies dwindle.


Lorraine on 2009-03-21 13:04:11

I have just had the most insidious thought. Is this pre-planned to annihilate the poor and the elderly. Since they will be the ones most effected by the costs, they will not be able to heat their homes and they will probably die. Is this his intention. They way BO thinks, he would consider that saving money since then they would not have to pay out welfare or social security on these victims.

Maybe I am just paranoid, I don't know. But this has a really creepy feel to it. And no one can deny that the elderly (and most of them are on fixed incomes) are the ones that will suffer the most.


Betty on 2009-03-23 07:56:46

It will not only be the elderly and fixed income people suffering..remember jobs are being lost and people can not be on unemployment forever. About three months into obama's campaign for president I started researching him and at that time knew what kind of a person his is. I have never had a good feeling about him..nor do I think he has this country and its people at heart. Let me put it this way. I don't think he has sleepless nights wondering how he is going to take care of this country and the citizens.


John Bowman on 2009-03-21 23:13:14

Lorraine, you are paranoid. if BHO screws all the poor people, who will be left to vote for him? Poor people elected him by a wicked majority. The election results are published. He can't get reelected without them and we all know that is what politics is all about, reelection.


Cory on 2009-04-04 01:44:28

Obama lied!!! He said in his campaign that he would give tax cuts to 95% of americans, and also said he would be responsible. He and the lousy democrats(HITLERS) in control right now have increased our debt more in the last 3 months of their reign than all the other administrations put together for over the last 200+years!!!! He and the Hitlers are going to bring this country to it's knees.

As true loving AMERICAN'S we need to get together and call for special a special/emergency elections to vote these democrat loosers in the HOUSE, SENATE, and PRESIDENT out and get someone in there who will know how to be responsible with OUR, yes OUR, money. I don't want to work for the government, they should be working for ME, YOU, and every other AMERICAN in this great country.

Let's get the Hitlers out of washington dc.

Obama lied, liberty died on January 20, 2009.


DaveinPhoenix on 2009-03-22 02:00:25

The negative net worth (according to the Treasury Dept.) of the federal government is $59 trillion and rising rapidly. Federal spending now accounts for 45% of our economy. In 1929, that number stood at 12%. So the private sector (which employs people) has shrunk from 88% to 55% of total spending. 1/2 of our debt is owned by foreign nations - some friendly, some not so friendly. They can sell off that debt in a matter of a few days and collapse the entire economy of this country. Our economic peril won't end until politics is replaced by problem solvers. Yes, I am extremely Conservative. But I'd rather save the country and lose an election than the opposite. I will keep reciting these facts everywhere I go, and with everyone I talk with until someone finally listens.

This website I found is an awesome source of information:

Grandfather Economic Report - Home Page - by MWHodges

http://mwhodges.home.att.net/


grendelkhan on 2009-03-22 11:52:25

"(and yes, that is another phony use of "tax cut" which is actually a welfare check redistributed from taxpayers to the 42% of Americans who pay no taxes)"

Pardon me; you meant to say "pay no *income* taxes". I must confess that I don't understand why payroll taxes simply don't seem to count when folks talk about who does and doesn't pay taxes. Is it just a cheap trick to make the tax system look more progressive than it is? I mean, the money comes out of your paycheck just the same way in either case. Would you argue that the Earned Income Tax Credit program is a welfare check, because it refunds payroll taxes, and since those aren't *real* taxes, it's refunding money that was paid out of *actual* taxes, so it's scary and socialist in a way that refunding income taxes isn't?

As a thought experiment, I'd recommend that you stop paying your self-employment tax (if self-employed), or attempt to convince your employer to give you, rather than the feds, your portion of the Social Security and Medicare taxes from your paycheck, and see how "real" those taxes are.


Rose2.0 on 2009-03-22 20:17:08

Hi Grendel! Hey - I'll concede that payroll taxes are "real" taxes just as soon as you acknowledge the net effect on higher earners of the proposed payroll tax increases along with the marginal rate increases.


grendelkhan on 2009-03-23 08:45:27

Of course payroll tax increases on higher earners would count as tax increases. As far as I know, the cap on Social Security taxes hasn't yet been lifted, though it's been proposed--is that actually likely to be put into effect any time soon?

But, sure, any change in payroll taxes should be counted when considering the taxes that the wealthy pay. I'm not, however, aware of any proposal to make the payroll tax rate any higher on the wealthy than it is on the not-so-wealthy (not to mention that wealthy people are more likely to have significant non-payroll income); factoring in payroll taxes, regardless of the proposed lifting of the Social Security cap, will not show a greater effect on higher rate payers. (Payroll taxes are regressive; if the cap were lifted, they would be a flat tax. Factoring them in makes the total tax structure look, respectively, less progressive and the same.)


citizenalaska on 2009-03-24 01:49:44

All I know is I am the smallest of small business owners. My wife answers phones at home, while I work in the field. my business grossed just over 100k this year, and after expenses we made 48,328. that was with 2 people working full time and 2 kids at home. I feel poor, but they call me middle class..they raise taxes across the board, and ask me to pay a higher electric bill? I live in alaska..(and just so you know..no-one anD nothing lives in the anwar part) . My bill already went from 240 a month in dec to 560 a month in jan and 497 for feb. This administrations ideas are killing me even b4 they are initiated....we need more power plants, and more competition in the power field. I live on top of the biggest recourse of natural gas, but some people thousands of miles away say i cant have it, while they burn natural gas every day. get government out of the way, and let the states manage the states.


Tom F. on 2009-04-13 11:46:39

What does everyone expect from Democrats? They know how to spend money and they know how to print money but ask them if they know how people actually "earn" money! We have become a nation that gives to the non doers and takes from the doers. Why go to work to earn a 3% raise when you can sit on your behind on welfare and get a 16% raise? Why be honest on your mortgage application and pay your mortgage on time when you can be dishonest on your mortgage application and get a bail out from the government? This administration is an absolute joke but noone is laughing................


Have an opinion?

 Name (required)
 Email (required)
 Website

If you were a member you wouldn't have to input that stuff!


What is 2 + 3 ? (seriously... for moderates the answer is 4 and for liberals the answer is cat)

Note: Your comment may be held for moderation.

blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you

Publius' Newsstand

  • State plan fines feds $2,000 over gun ru...

    Wyoming has joined a growing list of states with self-declared exemptions from federal gun regulation of weapons made, bought and used inside state borders – but lawmakers in the Cowboy State have taken the issue one step further, adopting significant penalties for federal agents attempting to enforce Washington's rules. According a law signed into effect yesterday by Democratic Gov. Dave Freudenthal, any agent of the U.S. who "enforces or attempts to enforce" federal gun rules on a "personal firearm" in Wyoming faces a felony conviction and a penalty of up to two years in prison and up to $2,000 in fines.

      Views: 117 Comments: 2

  • Scrambling for votes, Dems face uphill climb to...

    The math is getting simpler.
    If every House member votes and all Republicans reject the bill as expected, Pelosi can only afford 37 Democratic defections. That breakdown of the votes would lead to a 216-215 tally. Of the 34 no votes/leaning no votes, eight of them backed the House-backed bill in November. Meanwhile, nine Democrats who voted no last fall are publicly on the fence.
    So she needs to convince 6 people who voted no in the fall to vote yes now, i.e., she needs to convince 6 people who got it right last time to end their careers. Good luck with that.

      Views: 125 Comments: 4

  • The Cost of Democrats’ Failed Housing Policies ...

    "But if people had any idea of the damage he's [Rep. Barney Frank] done [by promoting the ‘affordable housing at all costs' policies] he's be out of there." -Thomas Sowell Taxpayer Bailout for FHA: The FHA's capital reserve ratio has fallen to .53 percent, well below its statutory ratio of 2 percent. [WaPo reported] "Although the FHA's default rate has been climbing for months, . . . the latest figures show that the FHA's woes are getting worse...If the trend continues and the FHA's cash reserves are exhausted, the federal government would automatically use taxpayer money to cover the losses." . . . National Security Implications: Bloomberg: "Russia urged China to dump its Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bonds in 2008 in a bid to force a bailout of the largest U.S. mortgage-finance companies, . . . Paulson said." ...

      Views: 150 Comments: 5

  • The beat goes on: Rep Gutierrez from 'yes' to '...

    Gutierrez, a member of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) in which he serves as chairman of its Immigration Task Force, said the caucus still has concerns over the extent to which the healthcare bill excludes illegal immigrants as well as legal residents from receiving benefits in the healthcare plan. "They are enough to say I can't support this bill," Gutierrez said during an appearance on MSNBC. This must be very frustrating for Nancy.

      Views: 105 Comments: 7

  • Very telling: Democratic candidates distance th...

    Enjoy reading this ... Hardly any Democrat running for Congress seems to want to talk about healthcare. Of the 26 leading Democratic House candidates contacted by The Hill, only one would commit to voting for the Senate healthcare bill if and when it comes to the House floor. Out of the more than two dozen Democratic challengers and open-seat House candidates, only 10 commented for this story. Eight outright declined to comment. Eight more didn’t respond to several days’ worth of requests via phone and e-mail. There is no more direct evidence than, well, direct evidence!

      Views: 79 Comments: 0

  • Hamas answer to Biden: Gaza Rocket Strikes Kibb...

    Nice job, Joe. You seemed to have made some headway: A Kassam rocket fired from Gaza damaged a building in Kibbutz Nirim on Thursday, the IDF said. In response, the Israel Air Force bombed a weapon manufacturing facility and an arms smuggling tunnel. "The IDF will not tolerate the firing of rockets by terrorist organizations at Israel and will continue to respond harshly against any attempt to disrupt the calm in Israel's southern communities," the IDF Spokesperson said. More than 25 rockets and mortars have been fired at Israel from Gaza since the beginning of the year.

      Views: 98 Comments: 0

  • NY23d: Hoffman makes it official: he'll run for...

    Douglas L. Hoffman rode a strong wave of conservative activism to a second-place finish in last fall's special election in the 23rd Congressional District. Now the Lake Placid accountant — and adopted son of the Tea Party movement — is back for a second try, but not without some competition. Mr. Hoffman formally entered the race for the Republican nomination Monday, telling his supporters in a letter posted to his Web site that he "will defeat Bill Owens" if there's a rematch. Listen to our interview with Doug on Liberty Pundits.

      Views: 109 Comments: 1

  • Smackdown time - The Hill: Alexander, Gregg thr...

    Senate Republican Conference Chairman Lamar Alexander of Tennessee and ranking Republican Finance Committee member Judd Gregg (N.H.) said they will force votes on virtually every sentence of the healthcare reform bill to overcome Democrats' parliamentary maneuver. Gregg said Republicans would force votes on a provision in the 1974 bill that says reconciliation can only be used to amend laws, plus another longstanding Senate rule that says reconciliation can only be used for budget-related issues, plus yet another Senate rule that says 60 votes are necessary to waive the budget-only rule. Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) sent a letter to Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) that insisted he had 41 votes for the last roadblock, thereby denying Democrats the magic 60.

      Views: 84 Comments: 0

  • Dems give up on flipping Stupak 12

    House leaders have concluded they cannot change a divisive abortion provision in President Barack Obama's health care bill and will try to pass the sweeping legislation without the support of ardent anti-abortion Democrats. A break on abortion would remove a major obstacle for Democratic leaders in the final throes of a yearlong effort to change health care in the United States. But it sets up a risky strategy of trying to round up enough Democrats to overcome, not appease, a small but possibly decisive group of Democratic lawmakers in the House.

      Views: 191 Comments: 1

  • Senate Parliamentarian: Obama must sign bill as...

    The Senate Parliamentarian has ruled that President Barack Obama must sign Congress’ original health care reform bill before the Senate can act on a companion reconciliation package, senior GOP sources said Thursday. The Senate Parliamentarian’s Office was responding to questions posed by the Republican leadership. The answers were provided verbally, sources said. House Democratic leaders have been searching for a way to ensure that any move they make to approve the Senate-passed $871 billion health care reform bill is followed by Senate action on a reconciliation package of adjustments to the original bill. One idea is to have the House and Senate act on reconciliation prior to House action on the Senate’s original health care bill.

      Views: 131 Comments: 0

Get Your PR Button!

Copyright © 2008-2009 Patriot Room Media, LLC
Privacy Policy  Terms Of Service